Ideal observer and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random images.

The problem of detecting symmetry has been studied by using digitally generated images with random pixel values. The statistical efficiency of humans and a computerized observer, the cross correlator of the image halves, has been evaluated. The efficiency of humans is approximately 100% when the image comprises only a few pixels and is notably better than that of the cross correlator. When the number of pixels in the image is increased, the detectability of symmetry gets better. For human observers detectability saturates, however, on a level corresponding to a modest number of pixels. Human efficiency in detecting symmetry is thus low when the image matrix size is large.

[1]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[2]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Human Signal Detection Performance For Noisy Medical Images , 1982, Other Conferences.

[6]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Statistical Efficiency Of Perceptual Decisions , 1984, Other Conferences.

[8]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Progress In Signal And Texture Discrimination In Medical Imaging , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Arthur E. Burgess.  Detection And Identification Efficiency: An Update , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[11]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H. Barlow,et al.  Limit to the detection of Glass patterns in the presence of noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  J. Hanley.  The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC Curves , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Decision Function Efficiency For Higher Order Imaging Tasks , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[17]  David G. Brown.  Neural Networks And Ideal Observers , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Vision: Texture discrimination: radiologist, machine and man , 1991 .