A Bayesian Framework for Tilt Perception and Confidence

The misjudgement of tilt in images lies at the heart of entertaining visual illusions and rigorous perceptual psychophysics. A wealth of findings has attracted many mechanistic models, but few clear computational principles. We adopt a Bayesian approach to perceptual tilt estimation, showing how a smoothness prior offers a powerful way of addressing much confusing data. In particular, we faithfully model recent results showing that confidence in estimation can be systematically affected by the same aspects of images that affect bias. Confidence is central to Bayesian modeling approaches, and is applicable in many other perceptual domains.

[1]  Adaptation , 1926 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. , 1937 .

[3]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.

[5]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  The Organization Of Curve Detection: Coarse Tangent Fields And Fine Spline Coverings , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  The Organization Of Curve Detection: Coarse Tangent Fields And Fine Spline Coverings , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  J. Beck,et al.  Line segregation. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[8]  S. Lehky,et al.  Neural model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1991 Mar;11(3):following Table of Contents] , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Mumford.  Elastica and Computer Vision , 1994 .

[11]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Completion energies and scale , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Contour Continuity in Region Based Image Segmentation , 1998, ECCV.

[13]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Spiking Boltzmann Machines , 1999, NIPS.

[14]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Tilt Aftereffects in a Self-Organizing Model of the Primary Visual Cortex , 2000, Neural Computation.

[15]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: binding local and global cues , 2001, Vision Research.

[18]  C. Gilbert,et al.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Jacobs.  What determines visual cue reliability? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: flanker orientation effects. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[23]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Elder,et al.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Lance R. Williams,et al.  Segmentation of Multiple Salient Closed Contours from Real Images , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  M. Morgan,et al.  Crowding and the tilt illusion: toward a unified account. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[28]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[29]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Alan A. Stocker,et al.  Constraining a Bayesian Model of Human Visual Speed Perception , 2004, NIPS.

[31]  S. Ullman,et al.  Filling-in the gaps: The shape of subjective contours and a model for their generation , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[33]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.