Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimised tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate via computer simulation a proposed improvement to clinical practice by deriving an optimised tube voltage (kVp) range for digital radiography (DR) chest imaging. METHODS A digitally reconstructed radiograph algorithm was used which was capable of simulating DR chest radiographs containing clinically relevant anatomy. Five experienced image evaluators graded clinical image criteria, i.e., overall quality, rib, lung, hilar, spine, diaphragm and lung nodule in images of 20 patients at tube voltages across the diagnostic energy range. These criteria were scored against corresponding images of the same patient reconstructed at a specific reference kVp. Evaluators were blinded to kVp. Evaluator score for each criterion was modelled with a linear mixed effects (LME) algorithm and compared with the score for the reference image. RESULTS Score was dependent on tube voltage and image criteria in a statistically significant manner for both. Overall quality, hilar, diaphragm and spine criteria performed poorly at low and high tube voltages, peaking at 80-100 kVp. Lung and lung nodule demonstrated little variation. Rib demonstrated superiority at low kVp. CONCLUSIONS A virtual clinical trial has been performed with simulated chest DR images. Results indicate mid-range tube voltages of 80-100 kVp are optimum for average adults. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE There are currently no specific recommendations for optimised tube voltage parameters for DR chest imaging. This study, validated with images containing realistic anatomical noise, has investigated and recommended an optimal tube voltage range.

[1]  Birsen Yazici,et al.  Development of a simulator for radiographic image optimization , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  E. Samei,et al.  Effects of Anatomical Structure on Signal Detection , 2000 .

[3]  C S Moore,et al.  Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Viviana Fanti,et al.  A simulation tool to support teaching and learning the operation of X-ray imaging systems. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography , 2004, European Radiology.

[7]  E. Fabbri,et al.  Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors , 2013, La radiologia medica.

[8]  C J Martin,et al.  Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  X G Xu,et al.  X-ray imaging optimization using virtual phantoms and computerized observer modelling , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  R. F. Bury,et al.  Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography , 2001, European Radiology.

[11]  Kristina Bliznakova,et al.  An integrated research tool for X-ray imaging simulation , 2003, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  G. Liney,et al.  A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  D R Dance,et al.  Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  Protocol for measurement of patient entrance surface dose rates for fluoroscopic X-ray equipment. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  C S Moore,et al.  Use of a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for the optimisation of chest radiographic techniques for computed radiography imaging systems. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Elena Gianaria,et al.  A GPU Simulation Tool for Training and Optimisation in 2D Digital X-Ray Imaging , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  C. Moore,et al.  Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[21]  C S Moore,et al.  An investigation of automatic exposure control calibration for chest imaging with a computed radiography system. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Andrew W Beavis,et al.  A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Claire Keeble,et al.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  Nicolas Freud,et al.  A computer code to simulate X-ray imaging techniques , 2000 .

[26]  Validation of a large-scale audit technique for CT dose optimisation. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[27]  A. Visani,et al.  Semiempirical simulation of x-ray detectors for imaging applications. , 2012, Medical physics.

[28]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[29]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[30]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[31]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[32]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[33]  John Yorkston,et al.  Relative impact of detector noise and anatomical structure on lung nodule detection , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[34]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.