The optimal balance between growth rate and survival in mammals

Evolutionary theory for life-history allometry in mammals is extended to include a trade-off between growth rate (or offspring production rate) and life span. The optimal balance between the two maximizes the product of the ‘height of the growth curve’ multiplied by the ‘average adult life span’. This product rule implies that longer-lived organisms are more efficient at using resources to prolong life.

[1]  E. Charnov.  Trade-off-invariant rules for evolutionarily stable life histories[readible copy] , 1997 .

[2]  J. Weiner,et al.  Interspecific Allometries Are by-Products of Body Size Optimization , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[3]  P. Harvey,et al.  Mammal life‐history evolution: a comparative test of Charnov's model , 1995 .

[4]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[5]  E. Charnov,et al.  Evolution of life history variation among female mammals. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  George C. Williams,et al.  Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack's Principle , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. , 1983 .

[8]  David Berrigan,et al.  Why do female primates have such long lifespans and so few babies? or Life in the slow lane , 2005 .

[9]  E. Charnov.  Evolution of mammal life histories , 2001 .

[10]  Eric L. Charnov,et al.  Life History Invariants: Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Ecology , 1993 .

[11]  H. Alvarez,et al.  Grandmother hypothesis and primate life histories. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  S. Stearns.  Trade-offs in life-history evolution , 1989 .

[13]  J. Millar,et al.  Life Histories of Mammals: An Analysis of Life Tables , 1983 .

[14]  E. Charnov,et al.  Why do primates have such long lifespans and so few babies , 1993 .