Communicating a company's positive impact on society-Can plausible explanations secure authenticity?

Organizations could prosper by delivering products and services that make society a better place. However, they face the challenge of successfully communicating what they contribute to society, especially if their contributions are closely related to their core business activities. The thin line between genuine societal engagement and the pursuit of profitability may feed society's increasing skepticism about the genuineness of organizations' care for societal issues. This study addresses the question of how a for-profit organization can successfully communicate what it intends to contribute to society while still coming across as authentic. If customers can explain the organization's envisaged societal contributions in terms of characteristics of the organization, they can see more clearly how its contributions fit the organization and will perceive the organization as more authentic. Perceived authenticity, in turn, increases customer loyalty and perceived fit enhances stakeholders' attitudes toward the organization's societal engagement.

[1]  M. Urde.  Core value-based corporate brand building , 2003 .

[2]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Causal Indicator Models: Identification, Estimation, and Testing , 2009 .

[3]  A. Talk,et al.  From Actions to Impressions: Cognitive Attribution Theory and the Formation of Corporate Reputation , 2004 .

[4]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .

[5]  J. Bakan.  The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power , 2004 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[7]  Shuili Du,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[8]  P. Herr,et al.  Impact of Dominance and Relatedness on Brand Extensions , 1996 .

[9]  Paul K. Shum,et al.  Ethics and Law: Guiding the Invisible Hand to Correct Corporate Social Responsibility Externalities , 2011 .

[10]  J. Edwards,et al.  The value of value congruence. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Maria Ferris,et al.  Workplace flexibility, work hours, and work-life conflict: finding an extra day or two. , 2010, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[12]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning , 2007 .

[13]  Kellie Liket,et al.  Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy , 2011 .

[14]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[15]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[16]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Communication Strategies for Brand Extensions: Enhancing Perceived Fit by Establishing Explanatory Links , 2000 .

[17]  Chankon Kim,et al.  Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporations, and purchase intentions: A South Korea study , 2009 .

[18]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[19]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Craig J. Thompson,et al.  Emotional Branding and the Strategic Value of the Doppelgänger Brand Image , 2006 .

[21]  Carrie S. Trimble,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Compatibility in Cause-Related Marketing Messages , 2006 .

[22]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions , 2009 .

[23]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[24]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment , 2006 .

[25]  R. J. Kent,et al.  Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity , 1994 .

[26]  S. Forsythe,et al.  Cause–brand alliances: Less familiar brands with familiar causes , 2011 .

[27]  Linda L. Price,et al.  Commercial Friendships: Service Provider--Client Relationships in Context , 1999 .

[28]  Matt Eyring,et al.  Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentes , 2011 .

[29]  E. Tauber,et al.  BRAND LEVERAGE: STRATEGY FOR GROWTH IN A COST-CONTROL WORLD , 1988 .

[30]  M. Strahilevitz,et al.  Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell , 1998 .

[31]  Dionysis Skarmeas,et al.  When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism , 2013 .

[32]  Nick Lee,et al.  Problems with formative and higher-order reflective variables , 2013 .

[33]  Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga,et al.  Derived versus full name brand extensions , 2009 .

[34]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns , 2003 .

[35]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Marcel van Oosterhout,et al.  Achieving High Performance in a Mobile and Green Workplace: Lessons from Microsoft Netherlands , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.

[37]  Carolyn J. Simmons,et al.  Achieving Marketing Objectives through Social Sponsorships , 2006 .

[38]  Laurence Ashworth,et al.  Damage from Corrective Advertising: Causes and Cures , 2008 .

[39]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[40]  Walter Wymer,et al.  The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications , 2009 .

[41]  Minette E. Drumwright,et al.  Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria , 1996 .

[42]  F. Keil,et al.  Explanation and understanding , 2015 .

[43]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication , 2010 .

[44]  D. R. Heise.  Employing Nominal Variables, Induced Variables, and Block Variables in Path Analyses , 1972 .

[45]  Francis Farrelly,et al.  The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers’ Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes , 2010 .

[46]  K. Grayson,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Iconicity and Indexicality and Their Influence on Assessments of Authentic Market Offerings , 2004 .

[47]  Barbara A. Lafferty.  The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility , 2007 .

[48]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs , 2006 .

[49]  R. Hill,et al.  The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior , 2006 .

[50]  John W. Selsky,et al.  Platforms for Cross-Sector Social Partnerships: Prospective Sensemaking Devices for Social Benefit , 2010 .