Communicating thin: A grounded model of Online Negative Enabling Support Groups in the pro-anorexia movement

The pro-anorexia movement provides support for those with anorexia and adopts an ‘anti-recovery’ view of the disease.The internet has allowed pro-anorexia followers (proanas) to exchange messages in anonymous virtual communities where they encourage one another to be thin. Through the analysis of pro-ana websites using grounded theory, four themes encompassing eight communicative strategies were identified: 1) co-constructing an ana personal identity; 2) self-loathing ana; 3) advising ana; and, 4) group ana encouragement. An emergent grounded model explicates underlying theoretical principles that indicate a new type of social support group, the Online Negative Enabling Support Group (ONESG), in which members encourage negative or harmful behaviors, accept ‘self’ or ‘other’ negative messages without correction from others and co-construct an affectionate ‘enabling in-group’ that evolves online ‘weak-tie’ support into ‘strong ties’ used to combat stigma in their offline world.

[1]  Julie Hepworth,et al.  An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Participation in a Pro-anorexia Internet Site and Its Relationship with Disordered Eating , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[2]  Chad Edwards,et al.  Social Identity in the Classroom: An Examination of Age Identification Between Students and Instructors , 2003 .

[3]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Challenges in conceptualizing social support , 2009 .

[4]  David J. Abramis,et al.  Effects of Different Sources of Social support and Social Conflict on Emotional Well-Being , 1985 .

[5]  K. Boydell,et al.  Ana and the Internet: a review of pro-anorexia websites. , 2006, The International journal of eating disorders.

[6]  D. E. Frable,et al.  Dimensions of Marginality: Distinctions among those Who are Different , 1993 .

[7]  J. Grube,et al.  Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support , 2001 .

[8]  J. Gavin,et al.  The Presentation of “Pro-Anorexia” in Online Group Interactions , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[9]  R. Kreipe,et al.  Pro or con? Anorexia nervosa and the internet , 2003 .

[10]  Emma Rich,et al.  Anorexic dis(connection): managing anorexia as an illness and an identity. , 2006, Sociology of health & illness.

[11]  D. Nesdale,et al.  Social identity and the development of children's group attitudes. , 2001, Child development.

[12]  D. Buhrmester,et al.  Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. , 1995 .

[13]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Self-Presentation and Gender on MySpace. , 2008 .

[14]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report , 2004 .

[15]  Felecia Briscoe,et al.  A Question of Representation in Educational Discourse: Multiplicities and Intersections of Identities and Positionalities , 2005 .

[16]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[17]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[18]  P. Drentea,et al.  Social capital and social support on the web: the case of an internet mother site. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[19]  Patrick W. Corrigan,et al.  Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma , 2005, European Psychiatry.

[20]  Katie J. Ward,et al.  Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the internet: an "anti-recovery" explanatory model of anorexia. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[22]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[23]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[25]  Janet Treasure,et al.  Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. , 2006, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Denise Sevick Bortree,et al.  Presentation of self on the Web: an ethnographic study of teenage girls’ weblogs , 2005 .

[28]  Duncan Cramer Social desirability, adequacy of social support and mental health , 2000 .

[29]  A. Crisp,et al.  Stigmatization of and discrimination against people with eating disorders including a report of two nationwide surveys , 2005 .

[30]  Keli Ryan Steuber,et al.  Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums , 2008 .

[31]  Vaughan Bell,et al.  Online information, extreme communities and internet therapy: Is the internet good for our mental health? , 2007 .

[32]  Leslie Regan Shade Weborexics: The Ethical Issues Surrounding Pro-Ana Websites , 2003, CSOC.

[33]  P. Thoits,et al.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[34]  G. H. Stamp,et al.  Communication and the experience of dialectical tensions in family life: An examination of abusive and nonabusive families , 1995 .

[35]  Bonnie Gance-Cleveland,et al.  School-Based Support Groups for Adolescents With a Substance-Abusing Parent , 2008, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[36]  H. Turner,et al.  A Preliminary Study of Negative Self-Beliefs in Anorexia Nervosa: A Detailed Exploration of Their Content, Origins and Functional Links to “Not Eating Enough” and Other Characteristic Behaviors , 2006, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[37]  Peter Conrad,et al.  Medicalization and Social Control , 1992 .

[38]  Karen Dias,et al.  The Ana Sanctuary: Women’s Pro-Anorexia Narratives in Cyberspace , 2003 .

[39]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Pro-anorexics and recovering anorexics differ in their linguistic Internet self-presentation. , 2006, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[40]  Jonathan Mond,et al.  Stigma and eating disorders: Is there evidence of negative attitudes towards anorexia nervosa among women in the community? , 2006 .

[41]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[42]  P. Keel,et al.  Stigmatization of anorexia nervosa. , 2006, The International journal of eating disorders.

[43]  P. Corrigan,et al.  The Paradox of Self-Stigma and Mental Illness , 2006 .

[44]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[45]  MARY K. WALSTROM,et al.  "You Know, Who's the Thinnest?": Combating Surveillance and Creating Safety in Coping with Eating Disorders Online , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[46]  Sharon R. Mazzarella,et al.  Book Review: Girl Wide Web: Girls, the Internet and the Negotiation of Identity , 2006, New Media Soc..

[47]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[48]  J. Treasure,et al.  Social support in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. , 1997, The International journal of eating disorders.

[49]  P. Thoits Social support as coping assistance. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[50]  P. Corrigan How stigma interferes with mental health care. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[51]  Jeff Gavin,et al.  Age/Sex/Location: Uncovering the Social Cues in the Development of Online Relationships , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[52]  Thomas A. Morton,et al.  Social Identity and Media Dependency in the Gay Community , 2000, Commun. Res..