DID SOCIALISM FAIL TO INNOVATE ? A NATURAL EXPERIMENT OF THE TWO ZEISS COMPANIES *

Two Carl Zeiss companies provide a natural experiment for analyzing the effects of socialist versus market systems on innovation. By analyzing patent records from 1950 to 1990, we trace the technological contributions of Zeiss Jena in the German Democratic Republic and Zeiss Oberkochen in the Federal Republic of Germany. We show that Zeiss Jena gradually developed considerable technological competence, but a deficiency of innovative potential within the socialist system led to political pressures on key firms to innovate by plan. These findings on Zeiss Jena imply that technologically viable firms can fail during the initial period of transition from socialism to capitalism. The diagnosis of a lack of innovation and faulty managerial incentives as the disease that is cured by market reforms should be balanced by an understanding of the actual capabilities of socialist firms and the difficulties of radical change mandated by brutal shocks to the macroeconomic system

[1]  A. Siegel,et al.  Reference groups, membership groups, and attitude change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[3]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of changing a major organizational reward: A natural field experiment. , 1974 .

[4]  H.-G. Schröter.  Aufstieg der Kleinen : multinationale Unternehmen aus fünf kleinen Staaten vor 1914 , 1993 .

[5]  Ian Jeffries,et al.  The Innovation Decision in Soviet Industry , 1977 .

[6]  Keijiro Tamenaga,et al.  International Patent Classification , 1980 .

[7]  Peter C. Murrell,et al.  Evolution in Economics and in the Economic Reform of the Centrally Planned Economies* , 1999 .

[8]  Akos Rona-Tas,et al.  The First Shall Be Last? Entrepreneurship and Communist Cadres in the Transition from Socialism , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[10]  R. Stone.  How Russia Became a Market Economy , 1995 .

[11]  F. Hayek,et al.  The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism , 1989 .

[12]  R. Owen.  The Challenges of German Unification for EC Policymaking and Performance , 1991 .

[13]  S. Winter.  Economic "Natural Selection" and the Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[14]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[15]  Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung.  Die Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung , 1989 .

[16]  David Stark,et al.  Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  I. Szelenyi,et al.  The Market Transition Debate: Toward a Synthesis? , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[19]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attitude toward troop withdrawal from Indochina as a function of draft number: Dissonance or self-interest? , 1971 .

[20]  M. Hout,et al.  More Shock than Therapy: Market Transition, Employment, and Income in Russia, 1991–19951 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  F. A. Hayek.  The Fatal Conceit , 1988 .

[22]  R. Vogt.  Transforming the Former GDR Into a Market Economy , 1992 .

[23]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Vote Turnout of Nineteenth Amendment Women: The Enduring Effect of Disenfranchisement , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[25]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[26]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Firm-Specificity in Corporate Applied R&D , 1994 .

[27]  David Stark,et al.  Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe , 1991 .

[28]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Vulnerability to Draft and Attitudes toward Troop Withdrawal from Indochina: Replication and Refinement , 1974 .

[29]  Antje Hagen,et al.  Export Versus Direct Investment in the German Optical Industry: Carl Zeiss, Jena and Glaswerk Schott & Gen. in the UK, from their Beginnings to 1933 , 1996 .

[30]  J. Kornai.  The road to a free economy: Shifting from a socialist system : the example of Hungary , 1991 .

[31]  M. Burawoy.  Review Essay , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[33]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[34]  Jorg Roesler.  Privatisation in Eastern Germany—Experience with the treuhand , 1994 .

[35]  Andrew G. Walder,et al.  Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Politicians and Firms , 1994 .

[37]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  The Economic Sociology of the Transitions from Socialism , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  K. Opp,et al.  Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989 , 1993 .

[39]  J. R Hackman,et al.  Organizations in Changing Environments: The Case of East German Symphony Orchestras , 1996 .

[40]  Robert Legvold,et al.  How Russia became a market economy , 1995 .

[41]  Schumann Wolfgang.  Carl Zeiss Jena einst und jetzt , 1963 .

[42]  K. Polanyi.  The Great Transformation , 1944 .

[43]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.