Application of Eshelby’s Solution to Elastography for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Eshelby’s solution is the analytical method that can derive the elastic field within and around an ellipsoidal inclusion embedded in a matrix. Since breast tumor can be regarded as an elastic inclusion with different elastic properties from those of surrounding matrix when the deformation is small, we applied Eshelby’s solution to predict the stress and strain fields in the breast containing a suspicious lesion. The results were used to investigate the effectiveness of strain ratio (SR) from elastography in representing modulus ratio (MR) that may be the meaningful indicator of the malignancy of the lesion. This study showed that SR significantly underestimates MR and is varied with the shape and the modulus of the lesion. Based on the results from Eshelby’s solution and finite element analysis (FEA), we proposed a surface regression model as a polynomial function that can predict the MR of the lesion to the matrix. The model has been applied to gelatin-based phantoms and clinical ultrasound images of human breasts containing different types of lesions. The results suggest the potential of the proposed method to improve the diagnostic performance of breast cancer using elastography.

[1]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  A nonlinear elasticity phantom containing spherical inclusions , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  Faouzi Kallel,et al.  Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  D. Plewes,et al.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J Ophir,et al.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Jiann-Wen Ju,et al.  Effective elastoplastic behavior of metal matrix composites containing randomly located aligned spheroidal inhomogeneities. Part I: micromechanics-based formulation , 2001 .

[7]  Chikayoshi Sumi,et al.  Spatially variant regularization for tissue strain measurement and shear modulus reconstruction , 2007, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[8]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Elastic modulus imaging: some exact solutions of the compressible elastography inverse problem , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  G. Cloutier,et al.  Vascular imaging modulography: an experimental in vitro study , 2010 .

[10]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography: Ultrasonic imaging of tissue strain and elastic modulus in vivo , 1996 .

[11]  J. D. Eshelby.  The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  Jonathan Ophir,et al.  Elastography: Imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound , 2002, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[13]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Young's Modulus Reconstruction for Radio-Frequency Ablation Electrode-Induced Displacement Fields: A Feasibility Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  M M Doyley,et al.  Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Jiann-Wen Ju,et al.  A Novel Formulation for the Exterior-Point Eshelby's Tensor of an Ellipsoidal Inclusion , 1999 .

[17]  Ian W. B. Grant.  Introductory Medical Statistics , 1976, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[18]  J. D. Eshelby,et al.  The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  Grace Wahba,et al.  4. Estimating the Smoothing Parameter , 1990 .

[20]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  I Céspedes,et al.  Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[24]  Frits Mastik,et al.  Young's modulus reconstruction of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque components using deformable curves. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  A R Skovoroda,et al.  [Reconstruction of elastic properties of soft biological tissues exposed to low frequency disruption]. , 1995, Biofizika.

[27]  Hui Zhi,et al.  Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[28]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Biophysical Bases of Elasticity Imaging , 1995 .

[29]  Assad A. Oberai,et al.  INVERSE PROBLEMS PII: S0266-5611(03)54272-1 Solution of inverse problems in elasticity imaging using the adjoint method , 2003 .

[30]  Kiyoshi Nakayama,et al.  Phantom Experiment on Estimation of Shear Modulus Distribution in Soft Tissue from Ultrasonic Measurement of Displacement Vector Field , 1995 .

[31]  L Levy,et al.  BIRADS ultrasonography. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[32]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Multiwave imaging and super resolution , 2010 .

[33]  Y. Fung.  Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. , 1967, The American journal of physiology.

[34]  Hyock-Ju Kwon,et al.  Application of digital image cross-correlation and smoothing function to the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[35]  K. R. Raghavan,et al.  Forward and inverse problems in elasticity imaging of soft tissues , 1994 .

[36]  H. Kwon,et al.  Low-cost quasi-real-time elastography using B-mode ultrasound images. , 2014, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[37]  Frits Mastik,et al.  Assessment of vulnerable plaque composition by matching the deformation of a parametric plaque model to measured plaque deformation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  E. Madsen,et al.  An anthropomorphic ultrasound breast phantom containing intermediate-sized scatterers. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[40]  Robert A Smith,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[41]  M. Bilgen,et al.  Elastostatics of a spherical inclusion in homogeneous biological media. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Toshio Mura,et al.  The Elastic Field Outside an Ellipsoidal Inclusion , 1977 .

[43]  Simona Celi,et al.  Advances in finite element simulations of elastosonography for breast lesion detection. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[44]  Boxin Zhao,et al.  The application of digital image techniques to determine the large stress–strain behaviors of soft materials , 2012 .

[45]  Patrick C. Walsh,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[46]  Toshio Mura,et al.  Micromechanics of defects in solids , 1982 .

[47]  Sebastian Wojcinski,et al.  Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. , 2010, Academic radiology.