Introduction to the Special Issue: The Literature Review in Information Systems

There has been a flowering of scholarly interest in the literature review as a research method in the information systems discipline. We feel privileged to contribute to this conversation and introduce the work of the authors represented in this special issue. Some of the highlights include three new methods for conducting literature analysis and guidelines, tutorials, and approaches for coping with some of the challenges involved in carrying out a literature review. Of the three “new method” papers, one (ontological meta-analysis and synthesis) is entirely new, and two (stylized facts and critical discourse analysis) are novel in the information systems context. The other four paper address more general issues: the challenges of effective search strategies when confronted with the burgeoning volume of research available, a detailed tool-supported approach for conducting a rigorous review, a detailed tutorial for conducting a qualitative literature review, and a discussion of quality issues. Collectively, the papers place emphasis beyond the traditional “narrative synthesis” on the importance of selecting the appropriate approach for the research context and the importance of attention to quality and transparency at all stages of the process, regardless of which approach is adopted.

[1]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis as a Review Methodology: An Empirical Example , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  Ontological Meta-Analysis and Synthesis , 2013, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[4]  Mary Tate,et al.  Beyond the "Mythical Centre": An Affirmative Post-Modern View of SERVQUAL Research in Information Systems , 2008, ECIS.

[5]  Peter Loos,et al.  Stylized Facts as an Instrument for Literature Review and Cumulative Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Mary Tate,et al.  Beyond synthesis: Contemporary and innovative approaches for analysing and presenting research literature , 2014 .

[7]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[8]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[9]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Incorporating Formative Measures into Covariance-Based Structural Equation Models , 2011, MIS Q..

[10]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  William R. King,et al.  Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews - Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Guy Paré,et al.  A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[16]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Mary Tate,et al.  Bayesian Structural Equation Models for Cumulative Theory Building in Information Systems - A Brief Tutorial Using BUGS and R , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  C. Hart Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. , 1998 .

[22]  Elfi Furtmueller,et al.  Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[24]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  The Fallacy of Formative Measurement , 2011 .

[25]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[26]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[27]  Mary Tate,et al.  Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature , 2013 .

[28]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .