Genetic Analysis of Zinc-Finger Nuclease-Induced Gene Targeting in Drosophila

Using zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) to cleave the chromosomal target, we have achieved high frequencies of gene targeting in the Drosophila germline. Both local mutagenesis through nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and gene replacement via homologous recombination (HR) are stimulated by target cleavage. In this study we investigated the mechanisms that underlie these processes, using materials for the rosy (ry) locus. The frequency of HR dropped significantly in flies homozygous for mutations in spnA (Rad51) or okr (Rad54), two components of the invasion-mediated synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) pathway. When single-strand annealing (SSA) was also blocked by the use of a circular donor DNA, HR was completely abolished. This indicates that the majority of HR proceeds via SDSA, with a minority mediated by SSA. In flies deficient in lig4 (DNA ligase IV), a component of the major NHEJ pathway, the proportion of HR products rose significantly. This indicates that most NHEJ products are produced in a lig4-dependent process. When both spnA and lig4 were mutated and a circular donor was provided, the frequency of ry mutations was still high and no HR products were recovered. The local mutations produced in these circumstances must have arisen through an alternative, lig4-independent end-joining mechanism. These results show what repair pathways operate on double-strand breaks in this gene targeting system. They also demonstrate that the outcome can be biased toward gene replacement by disabling the major NHEJ pathway and toward simple mutagenesis by interfering with the major HR process.

[1]  J. Gall,et al.  Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila by direct embryo injection with zinc-finger nucleases , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. McVey,et al.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[3]  Li Liang,et al.  Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  A Backup DNA Repair Pathway Moves to the Forefront , 2007, Cell.

[5]  N. Brissett,et al.  Nonhomologous end-joining in bacteria: a microbial perspective. , 2007, Annual review of microbiology.

[6]  Y. Rong,et al.  A Genetic Screen For DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila , 2007, Genetics.

[7]  T. Kunkel,et al.  RNA-templated DNA repair , 2007, Nature.

[8]  M. McVey,et al.  Multiple Functions of Drosophila BLM Helicase in Maintenance of Genome Stability , 2007, Genetics.

[9]  W. Engels,et al.  Multiple-Pathway Analysis of Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[10]  R. Kanaar,et al.  DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. , 2006, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  W. Engels,et al.  Template disruptions and failure of double Holliday junction dissolution during double-strand break repair in Drosophila BLM mutants , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Induction and repair of zinc-finger nuclease-targeted double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans somatic cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer,et al.  Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  M. Bibikova,et al.  Efficient Gene Targeting in Drosophila With Zinc-Finger Nucleases , 2006, Genetics.

[15]  W. Engels,et al.  Differential Usage of Alternative Pathways of Double-Strand Break Repair in Drosophila , 2006, Genetics.

[16]  T. Kunkel,et al.  A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[17]  Siuk Yoo,et al.  Functional analysis of the Drosophila Rad51 gene (spn-A) in repair of DNA damage and meiotic chromosome segregation. , 2005, DNA repair.

[18]  A. Gennery,et al.  Impact of DNA ligase IV on nonhomologous end joining pathways during class switch recombination in human cells , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  M. Lieber,et al.  Genetic Interactions between BLM and DNA Ligase IV in Human Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  M. McVey,et al.  End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila melanogaster Is Largely DNA Ligase IV Independent , 2004, Genetics.

[21]  L. Symington,et al.  Recombination proteins in yeast. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  M. Adams,et al.  Formation of deletions during double-strand break repair in Drosophila DmBlm mutants occurs after strand invasion. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Rio,et al.  Interplay between Drosophila Bloom's syndrome helicase and Ku autoantigen during nonhomologous end joining repair of P element-induced DNA breaks , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Adams,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Cycles of Strand Invasion During Repair of Double-Strand Gaps in Drosophila , 2004, Genetics.

[25]  Y. Hotta,et al.  Extra sequences found at P element excision sites in Drosophila melanogaster , 1992, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[26]  Y. Rong,et al.  The homologous chromosome is an effective template for the repair of mitotic DNA double-strand breaks in Drosophila. , 2003, Genetics.

[27]  L. Mullenders,et al.  The Drosophila melanogaster DNA Ligase IV gene plays a crucial role in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and acts synergistically with Rad54. , 2003, Genetics.

[28]  R. Lehmann,et al.  An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[29]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Enhancing Gene Targeting with Designed Zinc Finger Nucleases , 2003, Science.

[30]  M. Adams,et al.  Drosophila BLM in Double-Strand Break Repair by Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing , 2003, Science.

[31]  L. Symington.  Role of RAD52 Epistasis Group Genes in Homologous Recombination and Double-Strand Break Repair , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[32]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases. , 2002, Genetics.

[33]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Different types of V(D)J recombination and end‐joining defects in DNA double‐strand break repair mutant mammalian cells , 2002, European journal of immunology.

[34]  S Chandrasegaran,et al.  Requirements for double-strand cleavage by chimeric restriction enzymes with zinc finger DNA-recognition domains. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Y. Rong,et al.  Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[36]  F. Alt,et al.  DNA ligase IV deficiency in mice leads to defective neurogenesis and embryonic lethality via the p53 pathway. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[37]  S. Jackson,et al.  DNA double-strand break repair , 1999, Current Biology.

[38]  T. Schüpbach,et al.  Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[39]  A. Pastink,et al.  The Drosophila melanogaster DmRAD54 Gene Plays a Crucial Role in Double-Strand Break Repair after P-Element Excision and Acts Synergistically with Ku70 in the Repair of X-Ray Damage , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[40]  D. Barnes,et al.  Targeted disruption of the gene encoding DNA ligase IV leads to lethality in embryonic mice , 1998, Current Biology.

[41]  K. McKim,et al.  mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. , 1998, Genes & development.

[42]  R. Ray,et al.  okra and spindle-B encode components of the RAD52 DNA repair pathway and affect meiosis and patterning in Drosophila oogenesis. , 1998, Genes & development.

[43]  V. Gorbunova,et al.  Non-homologous DNA end joining in plant cells is associated with deletions and filler DNA insertions. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  J. Buerstedde,et al.  The Drosophila melanogaster RAD54 homolog, DmRAD54, is involved in the repair of radiation damage and recombination , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[45]  M. Lieber,et al.  Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining , 1997, Nature.

[46]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Disruption of Mouse RAD54 Reduces Ionizing Radiation Resistance and Homologous Recombination , 1997, Cell.

[47]  P. Hasty,et al.  A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[48]  J. Haber,et al.  Capture of retrotransposon DNA at the sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks , 1996, Nature.

[49]  A. Gabriel,et al.  Retrotransposon reverse-transcriptase-mediated repair of chromosomal breaks , 1996, Nature.

[50]  K. Nakao,et al.  Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Roth,et al.  High-frequency illegitimate integration of transfected DNA at preintegrated target sites in a mammalian genome , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[52]  R. Hodgetts,et al.  Protected P-element termini suggest a role for inverted-repeat-binding protein in transposase-induced gap repair in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1995, Genetics.

[53]  G. Gloor,et al.  Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[54]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  P element-mediated in vivo deletion analysis of white-apricot: deletions between direct repeats are strongly favored. , 1994, Genetics.

[55]  J. Palmer,et al.  RNA-mediated transfer of the gene coxII from the mitochondrion to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution. , 1991, Cell.

[56]  J. Palmer,et al.  RNA-mediated transfer of the gene coxII from the mitochondrion to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution , 1991, Cell.

[57]  D. Roth,et al.  Comparison of filler DNA at immune, nonimmune, and oncogenic rearrangements suggests multiple mechanisms of formation , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[58]  Deborah A. Siegele,et al.  THE GENETICS SOCIETY OF AMERICA. , 1942, Science.