Simultaneous data reconciliation and joint bias and leak estimation based on support vector regression

Abstract Process data measurements are important for process monitoring, control, optimization, and management decision making. However, process data may be heavily deteriorated by measurement biases and process leaks. Therefore, it is significant to simultaneously estimate biases and leaks with data reconciliation. In this paper, a novel strategy based on support vector regression (SVR) is proposed to achieve simultaneous data reconciliation and joint bias and leak estimation in steady processes. Although the linear objective function of the SVR approach proposed is robust with little computational burden, it would not result in the maximum likelihood estimate. Therefore, to ensure accurate estimates, the maximum likelihood estimate is applied based on the result of the SVR approach. Simulation and comparison results of a linear recycle system and a nonlinear heat-exchange network demonstrate that the proposed strategy is effective to achieve data reconciliation and joint bias and leak estimation with superior performances.

[1]  H. Su,et al.  Support Vector Regression Approach for Simultaneous Data Reconciliation and Gross Error or Outlier Detection , 2009 .

[2]  J. Romagnoli,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of biases and leaks in process plants , 1999 .

[3]  Miguel J. Bagajewicz,et al.  Gross error modeling and detection in plant linear dynamic reconciliation , 1998 .

[4]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Robust data reconciliation and gross error detection: The modified MIMT using NLP , 1997 .

[5]  Yu Miao,et al.  A Support Vector Regression Approach for Recursive vskip0.2 baselineskip Simultaneous Data Reconciliation and Gross ErrorDetection in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: A Support Vector Regression Approach for Recursive vskip0.2 baselineskip Simultaneous Data Reconciliation and Gross ErrorDetection in Non , 2009 .

[6]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Industrial Application of a Large-Scale Dynamic Data Reconciliation Strategy , 2000 .

[7]  J. A. Romagnoli,et al.  A Framework for Robust Data Reconciliation Based on a Generalized Objective Function , 2003 .

[8]  Richard S.H. Mah,et al.  Evaluation of schemes for detecting and identifying gross errors in process data , 1987 .

[9]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  New Support Vector Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[10]  M. Chadli,et al.  Data reconciliation: A robust approach using a contaminated distribution , 2008 .

[11]  Jose A. Romagnoli,et al.  Generalized T distribution and its applications to process data reconciliation and process monitoring , 2005 .

[12]  L. Biegler,et al.  Redescending estimators for data reconciliation and parameter estimation , 2001 .

[13]  Hongwei Tong,et al.  Detection of gross erros in data reconciliation by principal component analysis , 1995 .

[14]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  Wongphaka Wongrat,et al.  Modified genetic algorithm for nonlinear data reconciliation , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  D NOTES,et al.  Detection of Gross Errors in Process Data , 2004 .

[17]  L. Biegler,et al.  Simultaneous strategies for data reconciliation and gross error detection of nonlinear systems , 1991 .

[18]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[19]  Su Hongye,et al.  A Support Vector Regression Approach for Recursive Simultaneous Data Reconciliation and Gross Error Detection in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , 2009 .

[20]  Richard S. H. Mah,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio method for gross error identification , 1987 .

[21]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .