Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care.

IMPORTANCE That too few youth with special health care needs make the transition to adult-oriented health care successfully may be due, in part, to lack of readiness to transfer care. There is a lack of theoretical models to guide development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines, assessments, and interventions to improve transition readiness. OBJECTIVE To further validate the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition (SMART) via feedback from stakeholders (patients, parents, and providers) from a medically diverse population in need of life-long follow-up care, survivors of childhood cancer. DESIGN Mixed-methods participatory research design. SETTING A large Mid-Atlantic children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS Adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer (n = 14), parents (n = 18), and pediatric providers (n = 10). MAIN EXPOSURES Patients and parents participated in focus groups; providers participated in individual semi-structured interviews. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Validity of SMART was assessed 3 ways: (1) ratings on importance of SMART components for transition readiness using a 5-point scale (0-4; ratings >2 support validity), (2) nominations of 3 "most important" components, and (3) directed content analysis of focus group/interview transcripts. RESULTS Qualitative data supported the validity of SMART, with minor modifications to definitions of components. Quantitative ratings met criteria for validity; stakeholders endorsed all components of SMART as important for transition. No additional SMART variables were suggested by stakeholders and the "most important" components varied by stakeholders, thus supporting the comprehensiveness of SMART and need to involve multiple perspectives. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE SMART represents a comprehensive and empirically validated framework for transition research and program planning, supported by survivors of childhood cancer, parents, and pediatric providers. Future research should validate SMART among other populations with special health care needs.

[1]  zahra DR.hosseinigolafshani,et al.  Theory Construction and Model Building Skills , 2014 .

[2]  K. Bevans,et al.  159. A Systematic Review of Transition Readiness Measures , 2012 .

[3]  L. Schwartz,et al.  A social-ecological model of readiness for transition to adult-oriented care for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions. , 2011, Child: care, health and development.

[4]  P. White,et al.  Supporting the Health Care Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood in the Medical Home , 2017, Pediatrics.

[5]  K. Oeffinger,et al.  The cancer is over, now what? , 2011, Cancer.

[6]  E. Foster,et al.  Best practices in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the transition process and medical and psychosocial issues: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[7]  Robertag . Williams.  Fumbling the handoff: managing the transition to adult care for adolescents with chronic conditions. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[8]  R. Arceci.  Medical Care in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study , 2009 .

[9]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[10]  P. Nathan,et al.  Challenges after curative treatment for childhood cancer and long-term follow up of survivors. , 2008, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[11]  A. Kazak,et al.  Evidence-based assessment, intervention and psychosocial care in pediatric oncology: a blueprint for comprehensive services across treatment. , 2007, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[12]  N. Leech,et al.  Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? , 2007 .

[13]  W. Nehring,et al.  Promoting health care transitions for adolescents with special health care needs and disabilities , 2007 .

[14]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[15]  A. Kazak.  Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM): Research, practice, and collaboration in pediatric family systems medicine. , 2006 .

[16]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[17]  C. Ruff,et al.  The use of focus group methodology in health disparities research. , 2005, Nursing outlook.

[18]  R. Gibson,et al.  Health Care Transition: Youth, Family, and Provider Perspectives , 2005, Pediatrics.

[19]  Joseph Telfair,et al.  Providers' Perspectives and Beliefs Regarding Transition to Adult Care for Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease , 2004, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[20]  Kevin C Oeffinger,et al.  Health Care of Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[21]  Susan M Sawyer,et al.  Transition to adult health care for adolescents and young adults with chronic conditions: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[22]  Craig M. Schramm,et al.  A consensus statement on health care transitions for young adults with special health care needs. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[23]  P. White.  Access to health care: health insurance considerations for young adults with special health care needs/disabilities. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[24]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. , 2002, JAMA.

[25]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. , 2001, Health affairs.

[26]  K R Ginsburg,et al.  The reason and rhyme of qualitative research: why, when, and how to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. , 1999, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[27]  M. Sandelowski.  Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[28]  K. Knafl,et al.  Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. , 1993, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[29]  S. A. Pedersen.  [Validity of qualitative research]. , 1990, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[30]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[31]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[32]  J. Garbarino.  The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design: by Urie Bronfenbrenner Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979, 330 + p. , 1980 .