Virtual autopsy with multiphase postmortem computed tomographic angiography versus traditional medical autopsy to investigate unexpected deaths of hospitalized patients: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND "Virtual" autopsy by postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) can replace medical autopsy to a certain extent but has limitations for cardiovascular diseases. These limitations might be overcome by adding multiphase PMCT angiography. OBJECTIVE To compare virtual autopsy by multiphase PMCT angiography with medical autopsy. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01541995) SETTING: Single-center study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2013. PATIENTS Hospitalized patients who died unexpectedly or within 48 hours of an event necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MEASUREMENTS Diagnoses from clinical records were compared with findings from both types of autopsy. New diagnoses identified by autopsy were classified as major or minor, depending on whether they would have altered clinical management. RESULTS Of 143 eligible patients, 50 (35%) had virtual and medical autopsy. Virtual autopsy confirmed 93% of all 336 diagnoses identified from antemortem medical records, and medical autopsy confirmed 80%. In addition, virtual and medical autopsy identified 16 new major and 238 new minor diagnoses. Seventy-three of the virtual autopsy diagnoses, including 32 cases of coronary artery stenosis, were identified solely by multiphase PMCT angiography. Of the 114 clinical diagnoses classified as cardiovascular, 110 were confirmed by virtual autopsy and 107 by medical autopsy. In 11 cases, multiphase PMCT angiography showed "unspecific filling defects," which were not reported by medical autopsy. LIMITATION These results come from a single center with concerted interest and expertise in postmortem imaging; further studies are thus needed for generalization. CONCLUSION In cases of unexpected death, the addition of multiphase PMCT angiography increases the value of virtual autopsy, making it a feasible alternative for quality control and identification of diagnoses traditionally made by medical autopsy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.

[1]  I. Roberts,et al.  Minimally invasive autopsy employing post‐mortem CT and targeted coronary angiography: evaluation of its application to a routine Coronial service , 2014, Histopathology.

[2]  P. Mangin,et al.  Multi-phase postmortem CT angiography: recognizing technique-related artefacts and pitfalls , 2013, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[3]  R Meuli,et al.  Surgical interventions with fatal outcome: utility of multi-phase postmortem CT angiography. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[4]  P. Mangin,et al.  Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method. , 2013, International journal of legal medicine.

[5]  P. Mangin,et al.  Detection of hemorrhage source: the diagnostic value of post-mortem CT-angiography. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[6]  Atul Nakhasi,et al.  Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies , 2012, BMJ quality & safety.

[7]  M. Thali,et al.  Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy. , 2012, Radiology.

[8]  S. L. Murphy,et al.  Death in the United States, 2010. , 2012, NCHS data brief.

[9]  F. Gordo,et al.  Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: Discrepancies in critically ill patients* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[10]  G. Sauter,et al.  Virtual Autopsy as an Alternative to Traditional Medical Autopsy in the Intensive Care Unit , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  T. Patankar,et al.  Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study , 2012, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Mangin,et al.  Evaluation of postmortem MDCT and MDCT-angiography for the investigation of sudden cardiac death related to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  G. Rutty,et al.  Post-mortem computed tomography angiography: past, present and future , 2011, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[14]  I. Roberts,et al.  Technical report: diagnosis of coronary artery disease using minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[15]  C. Robinson,et al.  Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: proof of concept , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[16]  R. Meuli,et al.  Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[17]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? , 2009, Radiology.

[18]  K. Reinier,et al.  Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. , 2008, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[19]  Tobias Rudolph,et al.  CT data-based navigation for post-mortem biopsy--a feasibility study. , 2008, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[20]  J. Ligtenberg,et al.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[21]  M. Thali,et al.  Visualization and quantification of air embolism structure by processing postmortem MSCT data. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[22]  J. Baudot,et al.  Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  J. Vincent,et al.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[24]  G. O’Grady.  Death of the teaching autopsy , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Kathryn M McDonald,et al.  Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[26]  J. Nicolás,et al.  Clinical and autopsy correlation evaluated in a university hospital in Spain (1991-2000). , 2003, Pathology, research and practice.

[27]  P. Fernández-Segoviano,et al.  The autopsy as a tool to monitor diagnostic error , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[28]  I. Alafuzoff,et al.  Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras. , 1993, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[29]  I. Lauder,et al.  Clinical necropsy rates during the 1980s: The continued decline , 1993, The Journal of pathology.

[30]  L. Goldman,et al.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  W. Roberts,et al.  The autopsy: its decline and a suggestion for its revival. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  R. Cabot.  DIAGNOSTIC PITFALLS IDENTIFIED DURING A STUDY OF THREE THOUSAND AUTOPSIES , 1912 .