Modeling the Tennessee Eastman chemical process reactor using bio-inspired feedforward neural network (BI-FF-NN)

This study explores the application of bio-inspired algorithms (BIAs) in training artificial neural networks (ANNs) in the area of the nonlinear chemical process modeling. Motivated by the increasing complexity and operational efficiency of chemical processes, the need for schemes that can improve model identification of highly nonlinear systems is demanded. As a case study, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) chemical reactor problem is considered. The key issue is to find a particular architecture for an ANN that best model the TE chemical process. We propose the use of BIAs of bat algorithm (BA), firefly algorithm (FA), and artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm as mechanisms to automatically update the synaptic weights of ANN. These algorithms were conducted to increase the ability of ANN to adapt the dynamic aspect of the TE process and prevent trapping into a local optimum. The proposed modeling framework was devised with extensive experiments and statistical analysis to illustrate the usability and suitability of the entire modeling and identification procedures. The results were explored with a discussion using the mean square error (MSE) and the variance account for (VAF) criteria to assess the degree of identification performance of the TE case study model. The reliability of the presented models was compared with previously developed models for the same subsystems of the TE reactor using competitive, intelligent approaches. The comparative results show that the proposed approach provides superior modeling performance and outperforms its competitors.

[1]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Stability analysis of a three-term backpropagation algorithm , 2005, Neural Networks.

[2]  Heba Al-Hiary,et al.  Identification of a chemical process reactor using soft computing techniques , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[3]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[4]  M. Janga Reddy Mish SWARM INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT , 2009 .

[5]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm , 2010, NICSO.

[6]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Review on data-driven modeling and monitoring for plant-wide industrial processes , 2017 .

[7]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Data-Driven Process Monitoring Based on Modified Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  A. F. Sheta,et al.  Modeling the Tennessee Eastman Chemical Process Reactor Using Fuzzy Logic , 2005 .

[9]  Krzysztof A. Michalski,et al.  Comparative study of bio-inspired optimization algorithms and their application to dielectric function fitting , 2016 .

[10]  Hongbo Shi,et al.  Improved Kernel PLS-based Fault Detection Approach for Nonlinear Chemical Processes , 2014 .

[11]  JayHyung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[12]  Alaa F. Sheta,et al.  Design and Automation for Manufacturing Processes: An Intelligent Business Modeling Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems , 2013 .

[13]  Ju Chu,et al.  Integration of microbial kinetics and fluid dynamics toward model‐driven scale‐up of industrial bioprocesses , 2015 .

[14]  Kaixiang Peng,et al.  Adaptive total PLS based quality-relevant process monitoring with application to the Tennessee Eastman process , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[15]  Vasfi Eldem,et al.  Parameter and structure identification of linear multivariable systems , 1988, Autom..

[16]  Jianbin Qiu,et al.  Approaches to T–S Fuzzy-Affine-Model-Based Reliable Output Feedback Control for Nonlinear Itô Stochastic Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[19]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[20]  N. Ricker Optimal steady-state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[21]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Dynamic optimization of the Tennessee Eastman process using the OptControlCentre , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Huanhuan Chen,et al.  Cognitive fault diagnosis in Tennessee Eastman Process using learning in the model space , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[23]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems , 2002, Connect. Sci..

[24]  M. Janga Reddy,et al.  An efficient multi-objective optimization algorithm based on swarm intelligence for engineering design , 2007 .

[25]  JayHyung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear modeling and state estimation for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[26]  Yingwei Zhang,et al.  Quality-related fault detection approach based on dynamic kernel partial least squares , 2016 .

[27]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization , 2009, SAGA.

[28]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  Artificial bee colony algorithm , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[29]  Heba Al-Hiary,et al.  Identification and Model Predictive Controller Design of the Tennessee Eastman Chemical Process Using ANN , 2009, IC-AI.

[30]  Yong-Chang Jiao,et al.  Synthesis of Circular Antenna Array Using Crossed Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm , 2006 .

[31]  Mohieddine Jelali,et al.  Revision of the Tennessee Eastman Process Model , 2015 .

[32]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .