Kinematic Data Analysis for Post-Stroke Patients Following Bilateral Versus Unilateral Rehabilitation With an Upper Limb Wearable Robotic System

Robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation has become popular as one approach to helping patients recover function post-stroke. Robotic rehabilitation requires four important elements to match the robot to the patient: realistic biomechanical robotic elements, an assistive control scheme enabled through the human-robot interface, a task oriented rehabilitation program based on the principles of plasticity, and objective assessment tools to monitor change. This paper reports on a randomized clinical trial utilizing a complete robot-assisted rehabilitation system for the recovery of upper limb function in patients post-stroke. In this study, a seven degree-of-freedom (DOF) upper limb exoskeleton robot (UL-EXO7) is applied in a rehabilitation clinical trial for patients stable post-stroke (greater than six months). Patients had a Fugl-Meyer Score between 16-39, were mentally alert (19 on the VA Mini Mental Status Exam) and were between 27 and 70 years of age. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: bilateral robotic training, unilateral robotic training, and usual care. This study is concerned with the changes in kinematics in the two robotic groups. Both patient groups played eight therapeutic video games over 12 sessions (90 min, two times a week). In each session, patients intensively played the different combination of video games that directly interacted with UL-EXO7 under the supervision of research assistant. At each session, all of the joint angle data was recorded for the evaluation of therapeutic effects. A new assessment metric is reported along with conventional metrics. The experimental result shows that both groups of patients showed consistent improvement with respect to the proposed and conventional metrics.

[1]  Edward Taub,et al.  Harnessing brain plasticity through behavioral techniques to produce new treatments in neurorehabilitation. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[2]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  Jill Whitall,et al.  Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Randolph J. Nudo Role of Cortical Plasticity in Motor Recovery After Stroke , 1998 .

[5]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[6]  Dejan Milutinovic,et al.  Resolving the redundancy of a seven DOF wearable robotic system based on kinematic and dynamic constraint , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  James H. Cauraugh,et al.  Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  W. Byblow,et al.  Rhythmic Bilateral Movement Training Modulates Corticomotor Excitability and Enhances Upper Limb Motricity Poststroke: A Pilot Study , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  Nancy Byl,et al.  Redundancy Resolution of the Human Arm and an Upper Limb Exoskeleton , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Jiping He,et al.  RUPERT: a Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[13]  Jiping He,et al.  Design of a robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy device , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[14]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Real-Time Inverse Kinematics of the Human Arm , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A Computational Model of Human-Robot Load Sharing during Robot-Assisted Arm Movement Training after Stroke , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  T. Elbert,et al.  New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Joel C. Perry,et al.  Isotropy of an upper limb exoskeleton and the kinematics and dynamics of the human arm , 2009 .

[18]  S. R. Majumdar,et al.  Pneumatic systems : principles and maintenance , 1996 .

[19]  J.C. Perry,et al.  Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[20]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[21]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Adaptive friction compensation of servo mechanisms , 2001, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[22]  T. Matyas,et al.  Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Real-Time Inverse Kinematics Techniques for Anthropomorphic Limbs , 2000, Graph. Model..

[24]  S. Ramey,et al.  Intensive Pediatric Constraint-Induced Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial , 2006, Journal of child neurology.

[25]  N. Hogan,et al.  Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[26]  James H. Cauraugh,et al.  Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: Intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  N. Ward Neural plasticity and recovery of function. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[28]  R. Nudo Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Adaptive friction compensation of servo mechanisms , 1999 .

[30]  K J Sullivan,et al.  Activity-Dependent Factors Affecting Poststroke Functional Outcomes , 2001, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Two Coupled Motor Recovery Protocols Are Better Than One: Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Bilateral Movements , 2002, Stroke.

[32]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin - Exoskeleton Robot for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2009 .