Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments

To enhance presence, facilitate sensory motor performance, and avoid disorientation or nausea, virtual-reality applications require the perception of a stable environment. End-end tracking latency (display lag) degrades this illusion of stability and has been identified as a major fault of existing virtual-environment systems. Oscillopsia refers to the perception that the visual world appears to swim about or oscillate in space and is a manifestation of this loss of perceptual stability of the environment. The effects of end-end latency and head velocity on perceptual stability in a virtual environment were investigated psychophysically. Subjects became significantly more likely to report oscillopsia during head movements when end-end latency or head velocity were increased. It is concluded that perceptual instability of the world arises with increased head motion and increased display lag. Oscillopsia is expected to be more apparent in tasks requiring real locomotion or rapid head movement.

[1]  R J Leigh,et al.  Head perturbations during walking while viewing a head-fixed target. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  K H Ruddock,et al.  Oscillopsia: visual function during motion in the absence of vestibulo-ocular reflex , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  F E Guedry,et al.  The influence of active versus passive head oscillation, and mental set on the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  I Brown DID THE EARTH MOVE FOR YOU , 2001 .

[5]  J E Zacher,et al.  Post-rotatory nystagmus and turning sensations after active and passive turning. , 1998, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[6]  Roy S. Kalawsky Critical Aspects of Visually Coupled Systems , 1993, Virtual Reality Systems.

[7]  Luis Serra,et al.  Time-lag reduction in a medical virtual workbench , 1995 .

[8]  Wildzunas Rm,et al.  Visual display delay effects on pilot performance. , 1996 .

[9]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A survey of augmented reality" Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments , 1997 .

[10]  M. Griffin,et al.  Benefits of helmet-mounted display image stabilisation under whole-body vibration. , 1984, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  John Crawford,et al.  LIVING WITHOUT A BALANCING MECHANISM* , 1964, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[13]  R. Leigh,et al.  A reevaluation of the vestibulo‐ocular reflex , 1993, Neurology.

[14]  Scott S. Fisher,et al.  Defining, modeling, and measuring system lag in virtual environments , 1990, Other Conferences.

[15]  Marc Olano,et al.  Combatting rendering latency , 1995, I3D '95.

[16]  Tomasz Mazuryk,et al.  High fidelity for immersive displays , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[17]  I. Howard,et al.  Influence of Body Roll on Visually Induced Sensations of Self-Tilt and Rotation , 1999, Perception.

[18]  Mark H. Draper,et al.  The adaptive effects of virtual interfaces: vestibulo-ocular reflex and simulator sickness , 1998 .

[19]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Visual self-motion perception during head turns , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[22]  Jas. Middlemass,et al.  Archives of Neurology , 1903, British medical journal.

[23]  S. McKee,et al.  Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  G R Barnes,et al.  The effects of visual discrimination of image movement across the stationary retina. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[25]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate , 1994, TCHI.

[26]  R. So,et al.  Effects of lags on human operator transfer functions with head-coupled systems. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[27]  M. Young,et al.  Discrimination of Changes of Latency during Voluntary Hand Movement of Virtual Objects , 1999 .

[28]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Merging virtual objects with the real world: seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  Chris Shaw,et al.  On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment , 1991, UIST '91.

[30]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A frequency-domain analysis of head-motion prediction , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[31]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Head-coupled virtual environment with display lag , 1995 .

[32]  C. Oman,et al.  Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. , 1990, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[33]  M J Griffin,et al.  Sinusoidal and random whole-body vibration: comparative effects on visual performance. , 1982, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.