Filtering in SPECT Image Reconstruction

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging is widely implemented in nuclear medicine as its clinical role in the diagnosis and management of several diseases is, many times, very helpful (e.g., myocardium perfusion imaging). The quality of SPECT images are degraded by several factors such as noise because of the limited number of counts, attenuation, or scatter of photons. Image filtering is necessary to compensate these effects and, therefore, to improve image quality. The goal of filtering in tomographic images is to suppress statistical noise and simultaneously to preserve spatial resolution and contrast. The aim of this work is to describe the most widely used filters in SPECT applications and how these affect the image quality. The choice of the filter type, the cut-off frequency and the order is a major problem in clinical routine. In many clinical cases, information for specific parameters is not provided, and findings cannot be extrapolated to other similar SPECT imaging applications. A literature review for the determination of the mostly used filters in cardiac, brain, bone, liver, kidneys, and thyroid applications is also presented. As resulting from the overview, no filter is perfect, and the selection of the proper filters, most of the times, is done empirically. The standardization of image-processing results may limit the filter types for each SPECT examination to certain few filters and some of their parameters. Standardization, also, helps in reducing image processing time, as the filters and their parameters must be standardised before being put to clinical use. Commercial reconstruction software selections lead to comparable results interdepartmentally. The manufacturers normally supply default filters/parameters, but these may not be relevant in various clinical situations. After proper standardisation, it is possible to use many suitable filters or one optimal filter.

[1]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data using OSEM3D: correlation with CT. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[2]  Robert C. Hendel,et al.  Nuclear Cardiology: Technical Applications , 2008 .

[3]  S M Larson,et al.  Single-photon emission computed tomography of the normal liver. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Tom R. Miller,et al.  PET: Molecular Imaging and Its Biological Applications. , 2005 .

[5]  Mohammad Reza Ay,et al.  COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY BASED ATTENUATION CORRECTION IN PET/CT: PRINCIPLES, INSTRUMENTATION, PROTOCOLS, ARTIFACTS AND FUTURE TRENDS , 2007 .

[6]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Comparison of methods for thyroid volume estimation in patients with Graves' disease , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Pat Zanzonico,et al.  Basic Sciences of Nuclear Medicine. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  Alain Seret,et al.  Number of iterations when comparing MLEM/OSEM with FBP. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Alain Seret,et al.  Comparison of Different Types of Commercial Filtered Backprojection and Ordered-Subset Expectation Maximization SPECT Reconstruction Software , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[10]  R. Walle,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[11]  M. N. Salihin Yusoff,et al.  Relationship between the optimum cut off frequency for Butterworth filter and lung-heart ratio in 99mTc myocardial SPECT , 2010 .

[12]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Object dependency of resolution and convergence rate in OSEM with filtering , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[13]  D. Bailey,et al.  Objective analysis of tomographic ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pulmonary embolism. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  A. Cribier,et al.  Thallium-gated SPECT in patients with major myocardial infarction: effect of filtering and zooming in comparison with equilibrium radionuclide imaging and left ventriculography. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  K Van Laere,et al.  Image filtering in single-photon emission computed tomography: principles and applications. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[16]  J M Links,et al.  Wiener filtering improves quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with thallium-201 SPECT. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Maria Lyra Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT) and 3D Images Evaluation in Nuclear Medicine , 2009 .

[18]  B M Tsui The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Physics of SPECT. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  P. Bruyant Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Yan Yan,et al.  Scatter and Blurring Compensation in Inhomogeneous Media Using a Postprocessing Method , 2009, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[21]  Maria Lyra,et al.  Lungs SPECT image processing for volume and perfusion index estimation , 2008, 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[22]  A. Bossuyt,et al.  Renal technetium-99m-DMSA SPECT in normal volunteers. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  N Yui,et al.  Optimization of Butterworth filter for brain SPECT imaging , 1993, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[24]  B. C. Penney,et al.  Two-dimensional filtering of SPECT images using the Metz and Wiener filters. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  T. Yen,et al.  Technetium-99m-DMSA renal SPECT in diagnosing and monitoring pediatric acute pyelonephritis. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Dacian Bonta,et al.  Comparison of 99mTc-DMSA dual-head SPECT versus high-resolution parallel-hole planar imaging for the detection of renal cortical defects. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  M. N. Salihin Yusoff,et al.  Determination of the optimum filter for qualitative and quantitative 99mTc myocardial SPECT imaging , 2009 .

[28]  I Gunes,et al.  Detection efficiency of different bone SPECT processing protocols for the diagnosis of "spina bifida". , 1993, Journal of nuclear biology and medicine.

[29]  S. Cherry,et al.  Physics in Nuclear Medicine , 2004 .

[30]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  PET: Molecular Imaging and Its Biological Applications , 2004 .

[31]  Salem A. Sassi,et al.  A Comparison Between 3D OSEM and FBP Image Reconstruction Algorithms in SPECT , 2008, World Congress on Engineering.

[32]  M. Brauner,et al.  Usefulness of Tomographic Versus Planar Lung Scintigraphy in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in a Daily PracticeT , 2008 .

[33]  Nahid Yaghoobi,et al.  Qualitative evaluation of filter function in brain SPECT [Persian] , 2007 .

[34]  O. Nativ,et al.  Quantitative SPECT of DMSA uptake by the kidneys: assessment of reproducibility. , 1997, Kidney international.

[35]  S Ted Treves,et al.  Pediatric 99mTc-DMSA SPECT performed by using iterative reconstruction with isotropic resolution recovery: improved image quality and reduced radiopharmaceutical activity. , 2009, Radiology.

[36]  P W Doherty,et al.  Interactive visual optimization of SPECT prereconstruction filtering. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  M. Lyra,et al.  Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography and 3 Dimensional Quantitative Evaluation in Renal Scintigraphy , 2001, MICCAI.

[38]  M A King,et al.  An image-dependent Metz filter for nuclear medicine images. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  Christian Vanhove,et al.  OSEM reconstruction, associated with temporal fourier and depth-dependant resolution recovery filtering, enhances results from sestamibi and 201Tl 16-interval gated SPECT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  M. Mahesh The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents , 2002 .

[41]  J M Links,et al.  Planar and high-resolution SPECT bone imaging in the diagnosis of facet syndrome. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  Jann Mortensen,et al.  Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism , 2010, Nuclear medicine communications.

[43]  Y W Bahk,et al.  Pinhole SPECT imaging in normal and morbid ankles. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Dale L Bailey,et al.  Reinventing ventilation/perfusion lung scanning with SPECT. , 2008, Nuclear medicine communications.

[45]  H Zaidi,et al.  Comparative methods for quantifying thyroid volume using planar imaging and SPECT. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  Joachim E Wildberger,et al.  SPECT imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: automated detection of match and mismatch defects by means of image-processing techniques. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  Katrine Riklund,et al.  Gaussian prefiltering of 123I DAT SPECT images when using depth-independent resolution recovery. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  M W Groch,et al.  SPECT in the year 2000: basic principles. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[49]  Eftekhari Mehrdad,et al.  Determination of optimum filter in myocardial SPECT: A phantom study , 2004 .