The Dual Role of IS Specificity in Governing Software as a Service

This study addresses the theoretically neglected role of information system (IS) specificity for application governance, by referring to the allocation of applicationrelated decision authority and task responsibility between business and IT units. Based on the premise of organizational and technical ‘embedding’, and employing a transaction cost theoretic (TCT) lens, we develop the idea that customization and greater functional specificity of an IS lead to both more business unit governance through higher human asset specificity and more IT unit governance through higher technical specificity. Survey data from 76 organizations using different types of Software as a Service provide support for these ideas. Our results unveil a new dualism for explaining IT governance phenomena on the application level. Furthermore, we demonstrate a relevant appropriation of the frequency construct from TCT to this context. Besides practical implications, we outline contributions to IT governance, transaction cost, and IT artifact theories in the IS field.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information Systems: The State of the Field (John Wiley Series in Information Systems) , 2006 .

[2]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Impact of Human Asset Specificity on the Sourcing of Application Services , 2005, ECIS.

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2010 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[6]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[7]  Brayden G. King,et al.  The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions , 2009 .

[8]  W. V. Grembergen.  Strategies for Information Technology Governance , 2003 .

[9]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[10]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[13]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The New Institutional Economics , 1998 .

[14]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Beyond Transaction Cost Economics: Towards an endogenous theory of Information Technology Outsourcing , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[17]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[18]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[19]  Marshall Goldsmith,et al.  The organization of the future , 1997 .

[20]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[21]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[22]  Kuo Zhang,et al.  Software as a Service: An Integration Perspective , 2007, ICSOC.

[23]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[24]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[25]  J. Hennart,et al.  Explaining the swollen middle : Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy , 1993 .

[26]  Martin Fowler,et al.  Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture , 2002 .

[27]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[28]  Cor-Paul Bezemer,et al.  Multi-tenant SaaS applications: maintenance dream or nightmare? , 2010, IWPSE-EVOL '10.

[29]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[30]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[31]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems : the state of the field , 2006 .

[32]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[33]  Regina F. Bento,et al.  CLOUD COMPUTING: A NEW PHASE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT , 2011 .

[34]  David Whiteley,et al.  An Introduction to Information Systems , 2013 .

[35]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Carol V. Brown.  Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Enterprise resource planning--breakthrough and/or term problem? , 1998, DATB.

[38]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms , 2010, CACM.

[39]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  P. Weill,et al.  It Governance on One Page , 2004 .

[41]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[43]  Penny Candace Deans,et al.  The Impact of Social Media on C-level Roles , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.

[44]  Bin Gu,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty and IT Infrastructure Governance: A Curvilinear Relationship , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Boris Otto,et al.  SAP Customer Competence Center , 2007 .

[46]  Oliver Günther,et al.  The Impact of Software as a Service on IS Authority - A Contingency Perspective , 2011, ICIS.

[47]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Explaining the Governance of Software as a Service Applications: A Process View , 2012, MKWI 2012.

[48]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[49]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An assessment of the use of Transaction Cost Theory in information technology outsourcing , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Governance-Knowledge Fit in Systems Development Projects , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Managerial Competences for ERP Journeys , 2002, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[52]  Ron Weber,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Deep Structure of Information Systems , 1990, ICIS.

[53]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[54]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[55]  Mingdi Xin,et al.  Software-as-a-Service Model: Elaborating Client-Side Adoption Factors , 2008, ICIS.

[56]  R. David,et al.  A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics , 2004 .

[57]  F. A. Hayek.  The American Economic Review , 2007 .

[58]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Drivers of SaaS-Adoption – An Empirical Study of Different Application Types , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[59]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[62]  Remko van der Pols,et al.  Application Services Library (ASL): A Framework for Application Management , 2004 .

[63]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Multitask Agency, Modular Architecture, and Task Disaggregation in SaaS , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[65]  XueLing,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty and IT Infrastructure Governance , 2011 .

[66]  Wei Sun,et al.  Software as a Service: Configuration and Customization Perspectives , 2008, 2008 IEEE Congress on Services Part II (services-2 2008).

[67]  Claudia Löbbecke,et al.  What drives netsourcing decisions? An empirical analysis , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Research Challenges for Enterprise Cloud Computing , 2010, ArXiv.

[69]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[70]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Designing data governance , 2010, CACM.