Targetable Alterations in Adult Patients With Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Insights for Personalized Therapy

Importance Patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) have a median overall survival of less than 18 months. Identification of molecular abnormalities for which targeted therapies are available or can be developed is critical for improving patient outcomes. Objective To characterize targetable genomic alterations (GAs) in patients with STS. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study of next-generation sequencing results from 584 patients with STS included in the AACR GENIE Database. Main Outcomes and Measures Presence of targetable GAs in STS. Results Of 584 patients included in the analysis, 294 (50.3%) were men and 290 (49.7%) were women, with a median age of 56 years (range, 18-89 years). There were 331 (57%) patients with complex genomics sarcomas, 144 (25%) with translocation-related sarcomas, and 112 (18%) with other sarcomas (inactivating mutation, simple amplicon). A total of 2697 alterations were identified in 451 genes (1154 substitutions, 765 gene amplifications, 364 short indels and splicing variants, 346 gene homozygous deletions, and 68 gene rearrangements) with a median of 4 (1-53) per case. In order of frequency, the 20 genes most often altered were: TP53, MDM2, CDK4, RB1, ATRX, CDKN2A, PTEN, NF1, CDKN2B, KMT2D, GLI1, ATM, TERT, PI3KCA, NOTCH1, MAP2K4, ERBB4, ARID1A, TSC2, and TNFAIP3. At least 1 targetable GA was found in 239 cases (41%) with a statistically significant higher number in other and complex genomics sarcomas than in translocation-related sarcomas (respectively other: n=89, 82%, complex: n = 131, 40%, translocation: n = 19, 13%; &khgr;2 test, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Up to 41% of STS harbored at least 1 clinically relevant GA with potential to influence and personalize therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling can identify novel treatment paradigms to address the limited options and poor prognoses of patients with STS.

[1]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas , 2017, Cell.

[2]  V. Miller,et al.  Impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) on diagnostic and therapeutic options in soft-tissue and bone sarcoma. , 2017 .

[3]  Moriah H Nissan,et al.  OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[4]  David M. Thomas,et al.  Monogenic and polygenic determinants of sarcoma risk: an international genetic study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  F. Chibon,et al.  Clinical effect of molecular methods in sarcoma diagnosis (GENSARC): a prospective, multicentre, observational study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  J. Blay,et al.  Trends in survival for patients with metastatic soft‐tissue sarcoma , 2011, Cancer.

[7]  F. Chibon,et al.  Constant p53 pathway inactivation in a large series of soft tissue sarcomas with complex genetics. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[8]  J. Blay,et al.  Validated prediction of clinical outcome in sarcomas and multiple types of cancer on the basis of a gene expression signature related to genome complexity , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[9]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  Subtype-specific genomic alterations define new targets for soft tissue sarcoma therapy , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[10]  C. Harris,et al.  Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[11]  C. Fletcher,et al.  WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone , 2013 .