Exploring Multiple Solutions and Multiple Analogies to Support Innovative Design

Idea generation and design-by-analogy is a core part of design. Designers need tools to assist them in developing creative and innovative ideas. Multiple solutions can be developed based on single analog and designers derive principles of design from the analogs (products) they experience. There is little research that discusses creating multiple solutions from a single analog or how multiple analogs can assist designers in mapping high level principles of design. This study explores two phases of design-by-analogy in which designers have difficulty, generating multiple inferences from a single source analog and the identification of high level principles given multiple example analogs in the presence of noise. Two hypotheses are proposed to explore the importance of analogies in design. 1. Multiple solutions can be generated from a single analog. 2. The mapping of high level principles increases with the increase in the number of example analogs and decreases with the amount of noise. The paper presents two laboratory experiments, “Multiple Solutions” and “Multiple Analogies” conducted to answer the proposed research questions and to understand how designers can become better analogical reasoners. The experiments are explained in detail with the methods for collecting data, metrics and the analysis. The results from the pilot experiments show that engineers, when directed to, can create multiple solutions from a single analog. This can allow designers to find better solutions and to evaluate their inferences. Results from the second experiment also indicate the mapping of high level principles increases with an increase in the number of analogs and decreases with distracters. A significant interaction is also observed between these two factors. The results indicate more future work with a greater sample size.

[1]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[2]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[3]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures for future wall-climbing robots , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[4]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  How To Use Analogies For Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[5]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Gecko Inspired Surface Climbing Robots , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[6]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives , 2003 .

[7]  Apeksha Gadwal Exploring Two Phases of Design-by-Analogy "Multiple Solutions" and "Multiple Analogies" , 2010 .

[8]  D. Gentner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECTS OF ALIGNABILITY ON MEMORY , 2022 .

[9]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[10]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[11]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Saeema Ahmed,et al.  An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers , 2009 .

[13]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Abstraction of Biological Analogies for Design , 2004 .

[14]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors , 1981 .

[15]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Design , 1991 .

[16]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Julie S. Linsey Design-by-analogy and representation in innovative engineering concept generation , 2007 .

[18]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  5.8 Analogies per Hour , 2002, AID.

[19]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  REFERENCES TO PAST DESIGNS , 2005 .

[20]  John E. Hummel,et al.  The One-to-One Constraint in Analogical Mapping and Inference , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  K. Dunbar How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[22]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  Generating innovations through analogies: An empirical investigation of knowledge brokers , 2005 .

[23]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[25]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Fabrication of gecko foot-hair like nano structures and adhesion to random rough surfaces , 2003, 2003 Third IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2003. IEEE-NANO 2003..

[26]  Jenny L. Daugherty,et al.  Analogical Reasoning in the Engineering Design Process and Technology Education Applications , 2008 .

[27]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .