Economic and technical feasibility of a robotic autonomous system for train fluid servicing

Rail traffic in passenger miles [in the UK] is projected to increase by 100% over the next 30 years, which presents a considerable challenge for the current infrastructure to perform the regular fluid servicing tasks. Developing robotic autonomous systems for train fluid servicing is a prospect for which no solutions currently exist. Therefore, the economic and technical feasibility of a robotic autonomous system to perform several key fluid servicing tasks on passenger train vehicles is investigated. The fluid servicing tasks chosen include those that to a significant degree are repetitive or hazardous for humans to perform, and therefore if performed by a robotic autonomous system will release service personnel to focus on more suitable tasks. The economic and technical cases presented strongly support the use of a robotic autonomous system for fluid servicing of trains. Generally available robotic autonomous system technology has reached a state of development capable of delivering what is required once reliable couplings and fluid hose technologies have been developed for this application. Overall, the findings are that fluid servicing capacity will at least double for around 15% of the cost of an equivalent manual servicing facility, which represents a substantially attractive business case. There will be modest technical challenges to be overcome that will add unknown cost elements such as modifications to vehicle fluid ports for robotic autonomous system compatibility and development of long power hoses.

[1]  Dejan Ristic,et al.  A TOOL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT , 2013 .

[2]  N. Stanton,et al.  Applying hierarchical task analysis to medication administration errors. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Sa Robertson,et al.  Recent developments in hierarchical task analysis , 1996 .

[4]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  David Harrison,et al.  Robust automated servicing of passenger train fluids , 2017 .

[6]  Andrew Shepherd,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Service Robotics and Human Labor: A first technology assessment of substitution and cooperation , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Nastaran Dadashi,et al.  How do principles for human-centred automation apply to disruption management decision support? , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT).

[9]  D. E. Embrey,et al.  SHERPA: A systematic human error reduction and prediction approach , 2013 .

[10]  John D. Childs,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2015 .

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  B Kirwan,et al.  Railway action reliability assessment, a railway-specific approach to human error quantification , 2013 .

[13]  J. C. Williams,et al.  Heart—A Proposed Method for Achieving High Reliability in Process Operation by Means of Human Factors Engineering Technology , 2015 .

[14]  Mohammed Owais Qureshi,et al.  The Impact of Robotics on Employment and Motivation of Employees in the Service Sector, with Special Reference to Health Care , 2014, Safety and health at work.

[15]  David Harrison,et al.  Feasibility of Robotic Autonomous System for Train Fluid Servicing , 2017 .