Multiparametric control for enhanced biofilm selection in microbial fuel cells

BACKGROUND Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) directly convert the chemical energy present in wastewater into electricity. Enriching exoelectrogenic bacteria in the anode biofilm is a current and challenging research target. A multiparametric control strategy, focused on organic loading rate (OLR) and external resistance (Rext) parameters, is here proposed to enhance microbial selection in MFCs. RESULTS The study examines the performance of a swine manure fed MFC working at optimal electrical condition. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control was adopted to continuously optimize applied Rext. Subsequent OLR decreases were performed to gradually improve anodic biofilm exoelectrogenic activity. The study demonstrates that high OLRs (11.2 kg COD m−3 d−1) limit MFC electrochemical losses, and increase absolute values of organic removal rate (4.6 kg COD m−3 d−1) and current production (14.9 mA). On the other hand, low OLR adoption (0.7 kg COD m−3 d−1) results in higher organic matter removal (52%) and coulombic efficiency (higher than 70%) of the MFC. CONCLUSION A multiparametric control for MFCs is proposed. Combining MPPT control and low OLR results in rapid improvement of exoelectrogenic activity in MFCs biofilm. The developed strategy may be useful for future MFCs applications, in order to achieve efficient start-up and sustainable operation. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

[1]  B. Min,et al.  Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. , 2005, Water research.

[2]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Keith Scott,et al.  Electricity generation from cysteine in a microbial fuel cell. , 2005, Water research.

[4]  F. Harnisch,et al.  Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Byung Hong Kim,et al.  Challenges in microbial fuel cell development and operation , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  Sang-Eun Oh,et al.  Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Jurg Keller,et al.  Non-catalyzed cathodic oxygen reduction at graphite granules in microbial fuel cells , 2007 .

[9]  C. Buisman,et al.  Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Loading rate and external resistance control the electricity generation of microbial fuel cells with different three-dimensional anodes. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[12]  Hubertus V. M. Hamelers,et al.  Ion transport resistance in Microbial Electrolysis Cells with anion and cation exchange membranes , 2009 .

[13]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Electron fluxes in a microbial fuel cell performing carbon and nitrogen removal. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Michel Perrier,et al.  Comparison of real‐time methods for maximizing power output in microbial fuel cells , 2010 .

[15]  Kyu-Jung Chae,et al.  Methanogenesis control by employing various environmental stress conditions in two-chambered microbial fuel cells. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[16]  Boris Tartakovsky,et al.  The influence of operational conditions on the performance of a microbial fuel cell seeded with mesophilic anaerobic sludge. , 2010 .

[17]  T. Vogel,et al.  Is resistance futile? Changing external resistance does not improve microbial fuel cell performance. , 2010, Bioelectrochemistry.

[18]  R. P. Pinto,et al.  A two-population bio-electrochemical model of a microbial fuel cell. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Hubertus V M Hamelers,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on Coulombic efficiency in bioelectrochemical systems. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Jung Rae Kim,et al.  Automatic control of load increases power and efficiency in a microbial fuel cell , 2011 .

[21]  S R Guiot,et al.  The effect of real-time external resistance optimization on microbial fuel cell performance. , 2011, Water research.

[22]  Nico Boon,et al.  Autotrophic denitrification in microbial fuel cells treating low ionic strength waters. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Yong Chen,et al.  Scalable microbial fuel cell (MFC) stack for continuous real wastewater treatment. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[24]  Hubertus V M Hamelers,et al.  Bioelectrochemical systems: an outlook for practical applications. , 2012, ChemSusChem.

[25]  Jesús Colprim,et al.  Bioremediation of nitrate‐polluted groundwater in a microbial fuel cell , 2013 .

[26]  Narcís Pous I Rodríguez,et al.  Bioremediation of nitrate-polluted groundwater in a microbial fuel cell , 2013 .

[27]  Alan J Guwy,et al.  Control of power sourced from a microbial fuel cell reduces its start-up time and increases bioelectrochemical activity. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[28]  A. Kaur,et al.  Inhibition of methane production in microbial fuel cells: operating strategies which select electrogens over methanogens. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Alessandro Liberale,et al.  Reducing start-up time and minimizing energy losses of Microbial Fuel Cells using Maximum Power Point Tracking strategy , 2014 .

[30]  Ioannis Ieropoulos,et al.  Controlling for peak power extraction from microbial fuel cells can increase stack voltage and avoid cell reversal , 2014 .

[31]  Anna Vilajeliu-Pons,et al.  Microbiome characterization of MFCs used for the treatment of swine manure. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.