A hard-fork reconfiguration of the peer to peer Bitcoin network is described that substitutes tamper-evident logs and proof-of-stake consensus for proof-of-work consensus. The block creation rewards and transaction fees are reallocated to establish and staff a secure financial data network capable of handling the world's transactions with subsecond response time. The new system pays dividends to stake-offering bitcoin holders. In contrast to Satoshi Nakamoto's mesh network consisting of competing peers, this system uses an enterprise class network that is efficient, robust, and scalable, consisting of cooperating peers. The network backbone nodes host trustless nomadic agents. Thousands of distributed full nodes are paid to replicate a singleton blockchain built upon every 10 minutes by a nomadic mint agent whose actions are verified by its peers. This arrangement enables immediate acknowledgment to an issuing node that its transaction has been accepted. Less effort means that subsidized transaction costs will be lower. Network reconfiguration enables the processing of numerous microtransactions. Stake-weighted distributed consensus is achieved when necessary with less than one-half arbitrarily faulty nodes. Important invariants of the Satoshi Social Contract between core developers and users are maintained: The reward schedule, the blockchain format, the fixed number of bitcoins, and the decentralized, trustless protocol are untouched. The system remains a global distributed database, with additions to the database by consent of the majority, based on a set of transparent rules they follow.
[1]
Jim Dowling,et al.
Discovery of Stable Peers in a Self-organising Peer-to-Peer Gradient Topology
,
2006,
DAIS.
[2]
B. Laurie.
Decentralised Currencies Are Probably Impossible But Let ’ s At Least Make Them Efficient
,
2011
.
[3]
Joseph J. LaViola,et al.
Byzantine Consensus from Moderately-Hard Puzzles : A Model for Bitcoin
,
2014
.
[4]
Scott Shenker,et al.
Attested append-only memory: making adversaries stick to their word
,
2007,
SOSP.
[5]
Nicolas Houy,et al.
It Will Cost You Nothing to 'Kill' a Proof-of-Stake Crypto-Currency
,
2014
.
[6]
Mary Baker,et al.
Secure History Preservation Through Timeline Entanglement
,
2002,
USENIX Security Symposium.
[7]
Sunny King,et al.
PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake
,
2012
.