Does a familiarization step influence results from a TCATA task

Abstract Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA) is a multi-attribute temporal approach that extends CATA questions. It is based on continuous selection of the sensory attributes that are perceived as applicable for describing a focal sample during consumption. Compared to CATA, TCATA is a relatively intense and demanding task for consumers who have to focus their attention on the evolution of the sensory characteristics of samples during consumption. The present work evaluated a short familiarization step (7–10 min) where participants became acquainted with the list of sensory terms and applied these to a practice sample using a CATA task and also completed a TCATA task using a warm-up sample. All participants, including those who did not take part in the familiarization step, watched a demonstration video that explained how to use the TCATA software and to complete the task. Three consumer studies, each involving ∼100 participants, were conducted using dried apricots, peanuts, and milk chocolate. The TCATA curves when data were collected with and without the familiarization step were not systematically different. However, a small increase in sample discrimination was established and on this basis familiarization should be considered when using TCATA with consumers. A need to explore other familiarization protocols than the one used here exist in order to develop guidelines for implementation.

[1]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  A summary of projective mapping observations – The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements , 2013 .

[2]  N. Pineau,et al.  Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) as a sensory profiling technique , 2015 .

[3]  Lucía Antúnez,et al.  Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking. , 2015, Food research international.

[4]  G. Ares,et al.  Dynamic sensory characterization of cosmetic creams during application using Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA) questions , 2015 .

[5]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley , 2008 .

[6]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products , 2016 .

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  Jing Liu,et al.  Performance of Flash Profile and Napping with and without training for describing small sensory differences in a model wine , 2016 .

[9]  A. K. Baker,et al.  Temporal Check-All-That-Apply Characterization of Syrah Wine. , 2016, Journal of food science.

[10]  P. Schlich,et al.  Temporal Drivers of Liking , 2015 .

[11]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two TCATA variants for dynamic sensory characterization of food products , 2016 .

[12]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. , 2015, Food research international.

[13]  Paolo Masi,et al.  Temporal Dominance of Sensations: A review , 2014 .

[14]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Sensory panel consistency during development of a vocabulary for warmed-over flavour , 2001 .