Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia

Objective: To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Methods: All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (<$400/week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Results: There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94). Conclusion: These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.

[1]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[2]  Gavin Turrell,et al.  Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[3]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: evidence of a ‘coastal effect’ , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[4]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The burden of disease and injury in Australia. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[5]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in U.S. adults: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  A. Bauman,et al.  Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  Pranesh P. Chowdhury,et al.  Places to walk: convenience and regular physical activity. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[8]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[10]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[11]  T. Blakely,et al.  Ecological effects in multi-level studies , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[13]  David J. Martin,et al.  Optimizing Census Geography: The Separation of Collection and Output Geographies , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  C. Ross,et al.  Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter? , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Michael Rosenberg,et al.  Physical Activity Levels of Western Australian Adults 1999 , 2001 .

[16]  Dawn K. Wilson,et al.  Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[17]  Ana V Diez Roux,et al.  Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex world. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[18]  G. Kaplan,et al.  Poverty area residence and changes in physical activity level: evidence from the Alameda County Study. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[19]  Ian H. Langford,et al.  A User’s Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.10 , 2000 .

[20]  J. Sundquist,et al.  Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Majid Ezzati,et al.  The burden of disease and injury in Australia , 2000 .

[22]  N W Burton,et al.  Occupation, hours worked, and leisure-time physical activity. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[23]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[24]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Neighborhood Environment, Access to Places for Activity, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity in a Diverse North Carolina Population , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[25]  Hendriek C Boshuizen,et al.  Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  A. Diez-Roux,et al.  Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[27]  J. Brug,et al.  Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[28]  A. Bauman,et al.  Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[29]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  J. Salmon,et al.  Validity and reliability of a physical activity recall instrument among overweight and non-overweight men and women. , 2003, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[31]  N. Owen,et al.  Environmental Determinants of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior , 2000, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[32]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  J. Sallis,et al.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[34]  G. Turrell,et al.  Socioeconomic status and infant mortality in Australia: a national study of small urban areas, 1985-89. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[35]  Yun-Mi Song,et al.  Excess mortality from avoidable and non-avoidable causes in men of low socioeconomic status: a prospective study in Korea , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[36]  T. Blakely,et al.  A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.