Capacity prediction of cold-formed stainless steel tubular columns using machine learning methods

Abstract Current methods of designing cold-formed stainless-steel tubular columns provide a series of design formulae for columns to adapt to various grades of materials and failure modes. In this study, machine learning algorithms were used to establish a unified capacity prediction method. Test data on cold-formed stainless-steel tubular columns were collected from the literature, and Pearson correlation analysis was performed to establish the relations among the design parameters. Seven classical machine learning algorithms were introduced and developed to predict column capacity in a variety of cases used for the analysis. The results show that the random forest performs the best, followed by another gradient boosted tree-based ensemble algorithm, XGBoost. The non-dimensional slenderness of the member and of the cross-section (denoted as comprehensive parameters) are the two key parameters for capacity prediction in the current design methods, and are used as the feature input to acquire the base machine learning model. More models are evaluated by adding one or more material and geometric variables into the feature input. The analysis results show that the performance of the random forest algorithm can be significantly improved by considering the comprehensive parameters together with the member slenderness, ratio of tensile strength to yield strength, and strain hardening exponent. The predictions of the machine learning-based method were compared with those of the current design method in Eurocode. It is concluded that the proposed unified machine learning model provides more accurate results owing to the consideration of the diversities of both material properties and member failure modes.

[1]  Esther Real,et al.  Experimental study on ferritic stainless steel RHS and SHS beam-columns , 2016 .

[2]  Nuno Silvestre,et al.  A neural network based closed-form solution for the distortional buckling of elliptical tubes , 2011 .

[3]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Tubular Members. II: Beams , 1993 .

[4]  Petr Hradil,et al.  Global stability of thin-walled ferritic stainless steel members , 2012 .

[5]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Testing and numerical modelling of lean duplex stainless steel hollow section columns , 2009 .

[6]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  DESIGN OF STIFFENED ELEMENTS IN COLD-FORMED STAINLESS STEEL SECTIONS , 2004 .

[7]  Barbara Rossi,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Studies of Ferritic Stainless Steel Tubular Cross Sections under Combined Compression and Bending , 2016 .

[8]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Structural response and continuous strength method design of slender stainless steel cross-sections , 2017 .

[9]  Sajjad Tohidi,et al.  Neural networks for inelastic distortional buckling capacity assessment of steel I-beams , 2015 .

[10]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Structural stainless steel design: Resistance based on deformation capacity , 2008 .

[11]  Georgios E. Stavroulakis,et al.  A Neural Network Approach to the Modelling, Calculation and Identification of Semi-Rigid Connections in Steel Structures , 1997 .

[12]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Experiments on stainless steel hollow sections—Part 1: Material and cross-sectional behaviour , 2004 .

[13]  Amir Hossein Gandomi,et al.  New design equations for assessment of load carrying capacity of castellated steel beams: a machine learning approach , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[14]  Ben Young,et al.  Tests of pin-ended cold-formed lean duplex stainless steel columns , 2013 .

[15]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Discrete and continuous treatment of local buckling in stainless steel elements , 2008 .

[16]  Tuan Anh Pham,et al.  Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Critical Buckling Load of Structural Members under Compression Considering the Influence of Initial Geometric Imperfections , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[17]  E. L. Hines,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of minor axis steel connections , 1997 .

[18]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Experimental Study of Cold-Formed Ferritic Stainless Steel Hollow Sections , 2013 .

[19]  Ganping Shu,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study on the behavior of cold-formed stainless steel stub columns , 2013 .

[20]  Yasser Sharifi,et al.  Study of Neural Network Models for the Ultimate Capacities of Cellular Steel Beams , 2020, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering.

[21]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Carrying Capacity of Stainless Steel Columns in the Low Slenderness Range , 2013 .

[22]  Ben Young,et al.  Experimental investigation of cold-formed stainless steel columns , 2002 .

[23]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Shear capacity estimation of fully grouted reinforced concrete masonry walls using neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system models , 2017 .

[24]  M. M. Alinia,et al.  Behavior appraisal of steel semi-rigid joints using Linear Genetic Programming , 2009 .

[25]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  The continuous strength method for structural stainless steel design , 2013 .

[26]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Strength Curves for Metal Columns , 1997 .

[27]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Experiments on stainless steel hollow sections—Part 2: Member behaviour of columns and beams , 2004 .

[28]  Murat Pala,et al.  Genetic programming-based formulation for distortional buckling stress of cold-formed steel members , 2008 .

[29]  Miguel Abambres,et al.  Neural network-based formula for shear capacity prediction of one-way slabs under concentrated loads , 2020 .

[30]  K. Rasmussen,et al.  Full slenderness range DSM approach for stainless steel hollow cross-section columns and beam-columns , 2017 .

[31]  Amir Hossein Rafiean,et al.  Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks , 2018 .

[32]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Full slenderness range DSM approach for stainless steel hollow cross-sections , 2017 .

[33]  Marley M. B. R. Vellasco,et al.  A neuro-fuzzy evaluation of steel beams patch load behaviour , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[34]  Mohammad Reza Sheidaii,et al.  Evaluation of compression member buckling and post-buckling behavior using artificial neural network , 2012 .

[35]  Reza Attarnejad,et al.  Assessment of load carrying capacity of castellated steel beams by neural networks , 2011 .

[36]  Barbara Rossi,et al.  Behaviour of structural stainless steel cross-sections under combined loading – Part I: Experimental study , 2015 .

[37]  Ran Yang,et al.  Study on the Bending Capacity of Cold-formed Stainless Steel Hollow Sections , 2016 .

[38]  Lorenzo Macorini,et al.  Formulae for Calculating Elastic Local Buckling Stresses of Full Structural Cross-sections , 2019, Structures.

[39]  Seong-Hoon Hwang,et al.  Data-driven machine-learning-based seismic failure mode identification of reinforced concrete shear walls , 2020 .

[40]  Abdulkadir Cevik,et al.  A new formulation for web crippling strength of cold-formed steel sheeting using genetic programming , 2007 .

[41]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Stub column tests on stainless steel built-up sections , 2014 .

[42]  M. Ashraf,et al.  Numerical investigation on buckling resistance of stainless steel hollow members , 2017 .

[43]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Strength Curves for Metal Plates in Compression , 2003 .

[44]  Nhat-Duc Hoang,et al.  Predicting Compressive Strength of High-Performance Concrete Using Metaheuristic-Optimized Least Squares Support Vector Regression , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[45]  Harun Tanyildizi,et al.  Predicting the core compressive strength of self-compacting concrete (SCC) mixtures with mineral additives using artificial neural network , 2011 .

[46]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  New machine learning prediction models for compressive strength of concrete modified with glass cullet , 2019, Engineering Computations.

[47]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[48]  Ben Young,et al.  Buckling of stainless steel square hollow section compression members , 2003 .

[49]  De-Cheng Feng,et al.  Failure mode classification and bearing capacity prediction for reinforced concrete columns based on ensemble machine learning algorithm , 2020, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[50]  Ben Young,et al.  Behavior of Cold-Formed High Strength Stainless Steel Sections , 2005 .

[51]  Sajjad Tohidi,et al.  Lateral-torsional buckling capacity assessment of web opening steel girders by artificial neural networks — elastic investigation , 2014 .

[52]  G. Shu,et al.  Design of cold-rolled stainless steel rectangular hollow section columns , 2020 .

[53]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Structural design of high-strength austenitic stainless steel , 2006 .

[54]  null null,et al.  Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members , 2002 .

[55]  Ben Young,et al.  Tests of cold-formed high strength stainless steel compression members , 2006 .

[56]  Ali Sadrmomtazi,et al.  Modeling compressive strength of EPS lightweight concrete using regression, neural network and ANFIS , 2013 .

[57]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  A new prediction model for the load capacity of castellated steel beams , 2011 .

[58]  Ganping Shu,et al.  A new design method for stainless steel columns subjected to flexural buckling , 2014 .

[59]  Esther Real,et al.  Experiments on cold-formed ferritic stainless steel slender sections , 2015 .