Breast Cancer Assessment With Pulse-Echo Speed of Sound Ultrasound From Intrinsic Tissue Reflections: Proof-of-Concept.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to differentiate malignant and benign solid breast lesions with a novel ultrasound (US) technique, which measures speed of sound (SoS) using standard US transducers and intrinsic tissue reflections and scattering (speckles) as internal reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective comparison study was performed with prior written informed consent from 20 women. Ten women with histological proven breast cancer and 10 with fibroadenoma were measured. A conventional US system with a linear probe was used for SoS-US (SonixTouch; Ultrasonix, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada). Tissue speckle reflections served as a timing reference for the US signals transmitted through the breasts. Relative phase inconsistencies were detected using plane wave measurements from different angular directions, and SoS images with 0.5-mm resolution were generated using a spatial domain reconstruction algorithm. The SoS of tumors were compared with the breast density of a larger cohort of 106 healthy women. RESULTS Breast lesions show focal increments ΔSoS (meters per second) with respect to the tissue background. Peak ΔSoS values were evaluated. Breast carcinoma showed significantly higher ΔSoS than fibroadenomas ([INCREMENT]SoS > 41.64 m/s: sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 80%; area under curve, 0.910) and healthy breast tissue of different densities (area under curve, 0.938; sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 96.5%). The lesion localization in SoS-US images was consistent with B-mode imaging and repeated SoS-US measurements were reproducible. CONCLUSIONS Using SoS-US, based on conventional US and tissue speckles as timing reference, breast carcinoma showed significantly higher SoS values than fibroadenoma and healthy breast tissue of different densities. The SoS presents a promising technique for differentiating solid breast lesions.

[1]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Clinical Imaging with Transmissive Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  F. Dunn,et al.  Ultrasonic Scattering in Biological Tissues , 1992 .

[3]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  S. Goldenberg,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review , 1995, Cancer.

[5]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.

[6]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[7]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  A. Sahin,et al.  Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. , 2006, The oncologist.

[9]  Michael P. Andre,et al.  Pre-Clinical Experience with Full-Wave Inverse-Scattering for Breast Imaging , 2008 .

[10]  N. Duric,et al.  Diffraction and coherence in breast ultrasound tomography: a study with a toroidal array. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  Neb Duric,et al.  Monitoring breast masses with ultrasound tomography in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Cuiping Li,et al.  In-vivo imaging results with ultrasound tomography: report on an ongoing study at the Karmanos Cancer Institute , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[13]  V. Marmarelis Detection of breast cancer via 3D multi-modal ultrasound tomography , 2011 .

[14]  Peter J. Littrup,et al.  In-vivo imaging of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: probing the tumor environment , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[15]  D. Reeve Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Effects of Precompression on Elasticity Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  Colleen H. Neal,et al.  Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  Jingfeng Jiang,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Elastic Modulus Imaging: An Application to Breast Cancer Diagnosis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  F. S. George,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[20]  N. Duric,et al.  Combining time of flight and diffraction tomography for high resolution breast imaging: initial in vivo results (L). , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  V. Marmarelis,et al.  Novel technology of multimodal ultrasound tomography detects breast lesions , 2013, European Radiology.

[22]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[23]  C. Purdie,et al.  What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography? , 2014, European Radiology.

[24]  I. Liovarou Clinical Use of Multimodal Ultrasound Tomography (MUT) for Breast Cancer Detection , 2013 .

[25]  Jame Abraham,et al.  Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[26]  Nataly Wieberneit,et al.  A Study on Mastectomy Samples to Evaluate Breast Imaging Quality and Potential Clinical Relevance of Differential Phase Contrast Mammography , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Jinbum Kang,et al.  Phantom and in vivo evaluation of sound speed estimation methods: Preliminary results , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[28]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Shear-Wave Elastographic Features of Breast Cancers: Comparison With Mechanical Elasticity and Histopathologic Characteristics , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[29]  V. Marmarelis,et al.  Differentiation of BIRADS-4 small breast lesions via Multimodal Ultrasound Tomography , 2015, European Radiology.

[30]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  Cuiping Li,et al.  Waveform inversion with source encoding for breast sound speed reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[32]  Martin Frenz,et al.  Towards clinical computed ultrasound tomography in echo-mode: Dynamic range artefact reduction. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[33]  Christiane K. Kuhl,et al.  The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective , 2016, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[34]  Torsten Hopp,et al.  Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[35]  The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective , 2016, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[36]  Nataly Wieberneit,et al.  Characterization of Cystic Lesions by Spectral Mammography: Results of a Clinical Pilot Study , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[37]  Gary J. Whitman,et al.  Screening Breast Ultrasound: Where Are We Today? , 2016, Current Breast Cancer Reports.

[38]  M. Chammas,et al.  Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications , 2017, Theranostics.

[39]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends , 2017, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[40]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening? , 2018, European Radiology.

[41]  Thomas Frauenfelder,et al.  Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[42]  B. Asselain,et al.  Study of Intrapatient Variability and Reproducibility of Quantitative Tumor Perfusion Parameters Evaluated With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[43]  B Stieltjes,et al.  Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility , 2017, European Radiology Experimental.

[44]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Dual-modal computer-assisted evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients on both real-time elastography and B-mode ultrasound. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[45]  Jennifer Bullen,et al.  Accuracy of Cyst Versus Solid Diagnosis in the Breast Using Quantitative Transmission (QT) Ultrasound , 2017, Academic radiology.

[46]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assessment , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Brian W. Anthony,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using ultrasound image echogenicity , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[48]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Compressed Sensing for Breast MRI: Resolving the Trade-Off Between Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[49]  K. Schilling,et al.  Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[50]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple‐Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[51]  Pamela Donlan,et al.  A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists. , 2017, Radiology.

[52]  W. Tran,et al.  Response monitoring of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative ultrasound, texture, and molecular features , 2018, PloS one.

[53]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Spatial domain reconstruction for imaging speed-of-sound with pulse-echo ultrasound: simulation and in vivo study , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[54]  Ga Young Yoon,et al.  Sonographic features that can be used to differentiate between small triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma , 2017, Ultrasonography.

[55]  Orcun Goksel,et al.  Speed of sound ultrasound: a pilot study on a novel technique to identify sarcopenia in seniors , 2018, European Radiology.

[56]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2018, Investigative radiology.