Influence Of Implant Thread’s Cross-Sectional Design On The Micromotion Of The Implants In Different Bone Qualities: Finite Element Analysis

Aim: To evaluate the effect of the implant’s thread cross sectional design on the micromotion of the implants in different bone qualities. Materials and methods: In this finite element analysis study, four implant models exhibiting four different thread designs were created using Solidworks software. Each model was assembled in four different bone quality models resulting in 16 groups. Each group was examined for micromotion under 100N force using ANSYS software. Results: D1 bone showed the lowest micromotion while D4 bone showed the highest, regardless the thread design. In D1 and D2 bone, v-shaped thread showed the lowest micromotion, which was lower than the square thread and the buttress was lower than the reverse buttress. While in D3 and D4 bone, the lowest micromotion was observed with the square thread, which was lower than the v-shaped and the reverse buttress thread was lower than the buttress thread. Conclusion: Micromotion decreases as the bone quality increases irrelevant of the implant thread design. In D1 and D2 bone, the best thread to be used is the v-shaped thread, while in D3 and D4 bone, the best is the square shaped thread.

[1]  D C Holmes,et al.  Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. , 1997, The Journal of oral implantology.

[2]  M. Kadkhodaei,et al.  The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis. , 2015, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[3]  A. Gulsahi Bone Quality Assessment for Dental Implants , 2011 .

[4]  Heng-Li Huang,et al.  Relationship of three-dimensional bone-to-implant contact to primary implant stability and peri-implant bone strain in immediate loading: microcomputed tomographic and in vitro analyses. , 2013, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  Shilpa Trivedi,et al.  Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. , 2014, Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research.

[6]  S. Tsutsumi,et al.  The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis , 2016, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[7]  A. S. Wong,et al.  Effect of Bone Material Properties on the Initial Stability of a Cementless Hip Stem: A Finite Element Study , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  Oğuz Eraslan,et al.  The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[9]  A V Rama Raju,et al.  Implant thread designs: An overview , 2018 .

[10]  Mohammed Sd,et al.  Basic Concepts of Finite Element Analysis and its Applications in Dentistry: An Overview , 2014 .

[11]  M. Reddy,et al.  Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry , 2018 .

[12]  Yasuhiro Tanimoto,et al.  Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant. , 2005, Dental materials journal.

[14]  C. Misch Contemporary Implant Dentistry , 1993 .

[15]  M. Sevimay,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Dan Dragomir-Daescu,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness. , 2016, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  C. English Dental Implant Prosthetics Carl E. Misch. , 2005 .

[19]  Hamid Mohammed H Alghamdi Methods to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Low Quality (Type-IV) Bone: An Overview , 2018, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[20]  Dehua Li,et al.  Influence of Thread Pitch, Helix Angle, and Compactness on Micromotion of Immediately Loaded Implants in Three Types of Bone Quality: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis , 2014, BioMed research international.

[21]  Ilser Turkyilmaz,et al.  Implant Dentistry: The Most Promising Discipline Of Dentistry , 2011 .