A method of uncertainty analysis for whole-life embodied carbon emissions (CO2-e) of building materials of a net-zero energy building in Australia

Abstract The construction of new buildings requires the use of a substantial amount of materials, which have an associated embodied energy for manufacturing, transport, construction and end-of-life disposal. A number of inventories have been developed to collate the typical embodied energy or carbon emissions associated with different building materials and activities, and these can be used to quantify the environmental impacts of different construction methods. However, uncertainty exists in the estimation of embodied CO2-e emissions and other environmental impact results, due to i) inconsistencies in typical embodied carbon emissions values in inventories; ii) errors in estimations of material quantities; iii) assumptions regarding building lifetimes, and iv) errors in estimations of transport distances. This current study quantified the uncertainties associated with the calculation of lifetime CO2-e emissions in a case study net-zero, in terms of operational energy, educational building. This study examined the lifetime impacts of building materials for the building based on a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) that had been previously undertaken for this site. The study considered the 19 building materials which most heavily influenced the total, transport and recurring embodied carbon footprint of the building and a probability distribution was generated to represent the variability for each of the following uncertain parameters: Lifetime, Embodied CO2-e and transport distance over the building's life. Random sampling was used to generate input variables (1000 samples) based on a probability distribution of each uncertain parameter relative to the building materials. Through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation, the environmental impact for each construction material for a 50-year building lifetime was predicted. Unlike the conventional LCA approach, which provides a single deterministic value, cumulative Monte Carlo distribution curves were used to provide a range of embodied CO2-e emissions for each construction material, and the whole building, through the lifetime of the building. The obtained results revealed a distribution of the total embodied CO2-e of a building which ranged from 2951 tCO2-e to 5254 tCO2-e. This variation in the life cycle carbon emissions highlights the importance of considering an uncertainty analysis in the LCA analysis.

[1]  Ch. Poinssot,et al.  Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cycles , 2014 .

[2]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in embodied carbon assessments : What are the implications of its omission? , 2018 .

[3]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[4]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Integrated life cycle cost method for sustainable structural design by focusing on a benchmark office building in Australia , 2018 .

[5]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say? , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Grace Ding,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of sustainable building materials: an overview , 2014 .

[7]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Structured Under‐Specification of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Data for Building Assemblies , 2019 .

[8]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Impact of structural design solutions on the energy and thermal performance of an Australian office building , 2017 .

[9]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment , 2011 .

[11]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  A global approach for sparse representation of uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessments of waste management systems , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[13]  Elisa Franzoni,et al.  Materials selection for green buildings: which tools for engineers and architects? , 2011 .

[14]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  The significance of various factors for GHG emissions of buildings , 2015 .

[15]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[16]  T. Muneer,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland , 2007 .

[17]  Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.  Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings , 2015 .

[18]  Grace Kam Chun Ding,et al.  The development of a multi-criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance for built projects and facilities , 2004 .

[19]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  A feasibility study of a stand-alone hybrid solar–wind–battery system for a remote island , 2014 .

[20]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules , 2012 .

[21]  Hao Sun,et al.  Identification of main influencing factors of life cycle CO2 emissions from the integrated steelworks using sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke,et al.  Sustainable Value Management for Construction Projects , 2017 .

[23]  Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.  Optimising embodied carbon and U-value in load bearing walls: A mathematical bi-objective mixed integer programming approach , 2018 .

[24]  F. Preston,et al.  Making Concrete Change Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete , 2018 .

[25]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Post-occupancy life cycle energy assessment of a residential building in Australia , 2014 .

[26]  Stephen Moysey,et al.  A Stochastic Approach to Model Dynamic Systems in Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[27]  Ian Farrance,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement: a review of monte carlo simulation using microsoft excel for the calculation of uncertainties through functional relationships, including uncertainties in empirically derived constants. , 2014, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[28]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Erratum to: A global approach for sparse representation of uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessments of waste management systems , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  Ali Akbarnezhad,et al.  Estimation and Minimization of Embodied Carbon of Buildings: A Review , 2017 .

[30]  Tak Hur,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental performance of sc-Si and mc-Si PV systems in Korea , 2014 .

[31]  Jiayuan Wang,et al.  A review on contemporary computational programs for Building's life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions assessment: An empirical study in Australia , 2018 .

[32]  Cuong N. N. Tran,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions assessment: An Australian commercial building perspective , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of user behaviour and physical parameters in residential building performance simulation , 2014 .

[34]  Mohammad Saghafi,et al.  Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems , 2011 .

[35]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  A pseudo-statistical approach to treat choice uncertainty: the example of partitioning allocation methods , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  G. Kokogiannakis,et al.  Incorporating environmental evaluation and thermal properties of concrete mix designs , 2016 .

[37]  C. W. Chan,et al.  Review of life cycle analyses and embodied energy requirements of single-crystalline and multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[38]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Life cycle costing for obtaining concrete credits in green star rating system in Australia , 2018 .

[39]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  A multi-scale life-cycle energy and greenhouse-gas emissions analysis model for residential buildings , 2014 .

[40]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[41]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[42]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[43]  Tim Grant,et al.  Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[44]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings , 2013 .

[45]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[46]  J. Gantner,et al.  Probabilistic Approaches to the Measurement of Embodied Carbon in Buildings , 2018 .

[47]  D. Trabucco,et al.  Embodied Carbon of Tall Buildings: Specific Challenges , 2018 .

[48]  G. Shen,et al.  Current Approaches for Embodied Carbon Assessment of Buildings in China: An Overview , 2018 .

[49]  Russell Richman,et al.  Life-Cycle Analysis of Roofing Insulation Levels for Cold Storage Buildings , 2009 .

[50]  Vanessa Montoro Taborianski,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the contribution of residential water heating systems to the variation of greenhouse gases stock in the atmosphere , 2004 .

[51]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review , 2010 .

[52]  Robert Ries,et al.  Quantitative approaches in life cycle assessment—part 2—multivariate correlation and regression analysis , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[53]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Actionable insights with less data: guiding early building design decisions with streamlined probabilistic life cycle assessment , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[54]  Henrik Brohus,et al.  Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings , 2009 .

[55]  Hitoshi Furuta,et al.  Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management , 2014 .

[56]  Craig Langston,et al.  Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: an analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies , 2008 .

[57]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Analysis of Time, Cost, and Environmental Impact Relationships at the Building-Material Level , 2016 .

[58]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[59]  Justo Garcia Navarro,et al.  Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact , 2006 .

[60]  De WolfCatherine,et al.  Material quantities and embodied carbon dioxide in structures , 2016 .

[61]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  International High-Performance Built Environment Conference – A Sustainable Built Environment Conference 2016 Series ( SBE 16 ) , iHBE 2016 The Carbon Footprint of Australia ’ s Construction Sector , 2016 .

[62]  Shahin Mokhlesian,et al.  Business model changes and green construction processes , 2012 .

[63]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Streamlining the Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings by Structured Under‐Specification and Probabilistic Triage , 2019 .

[64]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[65]  Eddie Schrevens,et al.  Parameter uncertainty in LCA: stochastic sampling under correlation , 2010 .

[66]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Quantified Uncertainties in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: What Can Be Concluded? , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  Bjørn Berge,et al.  The Ecology of Building Materials , 2000 .