The impact of learning styles on student performance in flipped pedagogy

Flipped classroom is an emerging pedagogical model with potentials to support active engagement and improve student performance. This research empirically validate the impact of: 1) Flipped classroom on student performance; and 2) Preferred learning style on student performance in a flipped classroom. We designed an experiment to compare the performance of students in flipped classroom with traditional teaching method. This experiment involves a total of 35 students. The students were divided into two separate classes (01 and 1E) taught by the same professor with the same contents and assessment methods. Students in Class 01 are the ‘experiment group’ and were taught with flipped method, while students in Class 1E are the ‘control group’ and were taught with traditional method. Data was collected from three components of student assessment (Participation, Homework, and Exam) and questionnaire; we used the questionnaire to group students by their preferred learning styles. The key findings after data analysis include a) Students in flipped classroom achieved 7% higher ‘Participation Grade’ than their peers in traditional. b) Students in traditional classroom achieved 17% higher ‘Homework Grade’ and 6% higher ‘Exam Grade’ than their peers in flipped classroom. c) Logical Learners outperformed Visual Learners by 10% in flipped classroom. Further, we discussed the implications of these findings to practice. We expect this paper to be useful and informative to higher education instructors who adopt or plan to adopt flipped classroom in their courses.

[1]  Joshua DeSantis,et al.  Do Students Learn More From a Flip? An Exploration of the Efficacy of Flipped and Traditional Lessons , 2015 .

[2]  สุธััญญา ด้วงอินทร์,et al.  Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day , 2017 .

[3]  Flipped Calculus: A Study of Student Performance and Perceptions , 2015 .

[4]  A. Röhl,et al.  The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity to Engage Millennial Students through Active Learning Strategies. , 2013 .

[5]  Timothy J. Hickey,et al.  Fully integrating remote students into a traditional classroom using live-streaming and TeachBack , 2016, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[6]  Ellen Francine Barbosa,et al.  Tools for the flipped classroom model: An experiment in teacher education , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[7]  Ashish Amresh,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped classrooms for teaching CS1 , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[8]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[9]  Kathleen E. Cook,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[10]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  K. Fulton Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. , 2012 .

[12]  M. Lage,et al.  Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment , 2000 .

[13]  A. Mill,et al.  Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course , 2014, Advances in medical education and practice.

[14]  Aaron Sams,et al.  Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day , 2012 .

[15]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[16]  John C. Strikwerda,et al.  Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH® Web‐based Streaming Video Software , 2002 .

[17]  Cristina Hava Muntean,et al.  An analysis of flip-classroom pedagogy in first year undergraduate mathematics for computing , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.