Vergence Eye Movements Elicited by Stimuli without Corresponding Features

We have observed quantitative depth perception with a dichoptic stimulus which possessed no contrast-defined binocular corresponding features (phantom stereogram). The depth perception can be the result of appreciation of a partial-occlusion situation depicted by the stimulus, or the result of activities of low-level disparity detectors which are capable of combining dissimilar local features in the stimulus. Although both mechanisms predict similar depth perception, they predict different vergence eye-movement outputs, especially in the vertical dimension. To identify the underlying mechanisms of the phantom stereopsis, we recorded vergence tracking eye movements to four types of dichoptic stimuli: (a) conventional stereogram with horizontal disparity (HD); (b) horizontal phantom stereogram (HP); (c) conventional stereogram with vertical disparity (VD); and (d) vertical phantom stereogram (VP). We found that HD, HP, and VD stimuli could elicit robust vergence tracking eye movements but VP stimulus could not. While the success of HP stimulus in eliciting vergence tracking may be explained by proximal vergence, the failure of VP stimulus in eliciting vergence tracking clearly indicates that phantom stereogram could not elicit coherent responses among low-level disparity detectors. Partial occlusion, therefore, has to play an important role in the depth perception from the phantom stereogram.

[1]  Andrew E. Kertesz,et al.  Human Vertical Fusional Response Under Open and Closed Loop Stimulation to Predictable and Unpredictable Disparity Presentations , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  R Jones,et al.  Vergence eye movements to pairs of disparity stimuli with shape selection cues. , 1972, Vision research.

[3]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  L. Liu,et al.  Matching needed for stereopsis , 1995, Nature.

[5]  G Westheimer,et al.  The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements. , 1969, Vision research.

[6]  C. Schor,et al.  Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-Dimensional structure from motion , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Jones,et al.  MOTOR RESPONSES TO CONFLICTING ASYMMETRICAL VERGENCE STIMULUS INFORMATION* , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  Experimental investigation of vertical fusional movements. , 1949, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Barbara Gillam.  Matching needed for stereopsis , 1995, Nature.

[12]  A E Kertesz.  Effect of stimulus size on fusion and vergence. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry , 1990, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular Matching of Dissimilar Features in Phantom Stereopsis , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  Lei Liu,et al.  Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence , 1994, Nature.

[16]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. , 1970, Vision research.

[17]  Proximal Vergence and Perceived Distance , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  R. Blake,et al.  Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D. Halpern,et al.  Stereopsis from motion-defined contours , 1991, Vision Research.

[20]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis , 1994, Nature.

[21]  Leon N. McLin,et al.  Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence , 1988, Vision Research.

[22]  J. T. Enright.  Perspective vergence: Oculomotor responses to line drawings , 1987, Vision Research.

[23]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.