Group structure, coding, and memory for digit series

Recognition and recall of digit series were studied as a function of segmental groupings imposed on the series either by the location of pauses or in the naming of successive numerical groups, e.g., 1735 was read to S as "seventeen, thirty-five." Experiments show that alteration of group structure of the same underlying digit string severely degraded memorial recognition of its repetition and that the normal improvement in immediate recall with repetition was annihilated by changing groupings at each presentation. Although a second presentation of a string with altered groupings is not recognized as a repetition of its earlier occurrence, this event is equivalent to an exact repetition when they are assessed by 5"'s later ability to. recognize an ungrouped version of the underlying string. Repetition with the same groupings establishes one strong trace, whereas repetition with changed groupings establishes two weak traces either of which may mediate recognition of the uncoded version of the string. The "reallocation" hypothesis was proposed as a summary of these results, whereby group structure affects perceptual coding, which determines "where" the trace of the event is stored. This was contrasted to a "bin" hypothesis for serial recall. Experiments to differentiate these involved recall of strings in which only a subsequence or portion recurred. As predicted by the reallocation hypothesis, recall of the recurrent constant chunk improved only when it was located at the beginning of the string.

[1]  G. Müller,et al.  Experimentelle Beiträge zur Untersuchung des Gedächtnisses , 1894 .

[2]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  A model and an hypothesis for language structure , 1960 .

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D. Hebb Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal , 1961 .

[5]  A. W. Melton Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory , 1963 .

[6]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[7]  R. V. Oakford,et al.  Tables of Random Permutations , 1963 .

[8]  R. Conrad,et al.  Order error in immediate recall of sequences , 1965 .

[9]  W. Kintsch,et al.  APPLICATION OF A MARKOV MODEL TO FREE RECALL AND RECOGNITION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Fodor,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistic segments , 1965 .

[11]  N. F. Johnson The psychological reality of phrase-structure rules , 1965 .

[12]  M. Garrett Syntactic Structures and Judgments of Auditory Events: A Study of the Perception of Extraneous Noise in Sentences , 1965 .

[13]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Recognition learning as a function of the length of the retention interval and changes in the retention interval , 1966 .

[14]  D. Norman,et al.  Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory ☆ , 1966 .

[15]  Edwin Martin,et al.  Stimulus recognition in aural paired-associate learning , 1967 .

[16]  R. McLean,et al.  Effects of induced chunking on temporal aspects of serial recitation. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Harley A. Bernbach,et al.  Stimulus learning and recognition in paired-associate learning. , 1967 .