Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies?

The challenge of implementing high-cost innovative technologies in health care systems operating under significant budgetary pressure has led to a radical shift in the health technology reimbursement landscape. New reimbursement strategies attempt to reduce the risk of making the wrong decision, that is, paying for a technology that is not good value for the health care system, while promoting the adoption of innovative technologies into clinical practice. The remaining risk, however, is not shared between the manufacturer and the health care payer at the individual purchase level; it continues to be passed from the manufacturer to the payer at the time of purchase. In this article, we propose a health technology payment strategy-technology leasing reimbursement scheme-that allows the sharing of risk between the manufacturer and the payer: the replacing of up-front payments with a stream of payments spread over the expected duration of benefit from the technology, subject to the technology delivering the claimed health benefit. Using trastuzumab (Herceptin) in early breast cancer as an exemplar technology, we show how a technology leasing reimbursement scheme not only reduces the total budgetary impact of the innovative technology but also truly shares risk between the manufacturer and the health care system, while reducing the value of further research and thus promoting the rapid adoption of innovative technologies into clinical practice.

[1]  M. Toumi,et al.  Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts , 2011, BMC health services research.

[2]  Christopher McCabe,et al.  Navigating Time and Uncertainty in Health Technology Appraisal: Would a Map Help? , 2013, PharmacoEconomics.

[3]  C. McCabe,et al.  Funding the Unfundable , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[4]  Karl Claxton,et al.  Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  R. Edlin,et al.  Access with Evidence Development Schemes , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  D. Cameron,et al.  Updated Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Trastuzumab for Early Breast Cancer , 2010, PharmacoEconomics.

[7]  Andrew Briggs,et al.  Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Norman Daniels,et al.  Accountability for reasonableness , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Louis P Garrison,et al.  Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. , 2010, Health policy.

[10]  N. Daniels,et al.  Accountability for reasonableness. , 2000, BMJ.

[11]  Jon Sussex,et al.  Critique of CHE Research Paper 81: Methods for the Estimation of the NICE Cost Effectiveness Threshold , 2013 .

[12]  W. Gregory,et al.  Expected Net Present Value of Sample Information , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.