Kansei Knowledge Extraction as Measure of Structural Heterogeneity

Representative measurements way of affective attributes is the Semantic Differential (SD) method in Kansei evaluation experiments. Structural heterogeneity of the subjective evaluations indicates the heterogeneous evaluation structure of each evaluator, which is presented individually by the specific selected factors. The objective of the structural heterogeneity modeling is not only to extract the general trends but also to identify the diverse individual evaluation structure. In this paper, we propose a Hierarchical Bayes Regression model with Heterogeneous Variable Selection (HBRwHVS), which simultaneously analyses the individual models and identifies the influential explanatory variables based on the framework of the Hierarchical Bayes Regression Modeling. The results offer the relational data between the evaluators and the selected items as carefully chosen explanatory variables. We apply the proposed method to the analysis of sensibility subjective evaluation data on traditional craft and show its effectiveness. After obtaining the estimated values of model parameters, cluster analysis is performed on subjects with the similar evaluation structures as another example of its applications.

[1]  Raquel Flórez López,et al.  Managing logistics customer service under uncertainty: An integrative fuzzy Kano framework , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception , 2000 .

[3]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A rough set based decision support approach to improving consumer affective satisfaction in product design , 2009 .

[4]  Halimahtun M Khalid,et al.  Embracing diversity in user needs for affective design. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  E. George,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association is currently published by American Statistical Association. , 2007 .

[6]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Simon Schütte,et al.  Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design : Kansei Engineering in Development , 2005 .

[8]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[9]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[10]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[11]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[12]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing: Rossi/Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2006 .

[13]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning , 2001, KDD '01.

[14]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[15]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Models for Heterogeneous Variable Selection , 2006 .

[16]  Jyh-Rong Chou,et al.  A Kansei evaluation approach based on the technique of computing with words , 2016, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics , 2004 .

[18]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A product configuration analysis method for emotional design using a personal construct theory , 2014 .

[19]  Z. Li,et al.  Extracting and summarizing affective features and responses from online product descriptions and reviews: A Kansei text mining approach , 2018, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  Paul Zikopoulos,et al.  Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data , 2011 .

[21]  E. George,et al.  APPROACHES FOR BAYESIAN VARIABLE SELECTION , 1997 .