Stimulating Reflection and Self-correcting Reasoning Through Argument Mapping: Three Approaches

[1]  M. Hoffmann.  Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing , 2016 .

[2]  Michael H. G. Hoffmann,et al.  Facilitating Problem-Based Learning by Means of Collaborative Argument Visualization Software in advance , 2015 .

[3]  Mark Felton,et al.  Arguing to Agree , 2015 .

[4]  Michael H. G. Hoffmann,et al.  Changing Philosophy Through Technology: Complexity and Computer-Supported Collaborative Argument Mapping , 2013, Philosophy & Technology.

[5]  Shelbie D. Witte,et al.  Writing to Learn by Learning to Write during the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas. , 2013 .

[6]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence , 2013 .

[7]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[8]  Tudor Groza,et al.  A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web , 2013, Semantic Web.

[9]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making , 2012 .

[10]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method , 2012, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[11]  S. O'Donohoe,et al.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2012, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

[12]  M. Hoffmann.  Climate Ethics: Structuring Deliberation by Means of Logical Argument Mapping , 2011 .

[13]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Maralee Harrell.  Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy , 2011 .

[15]  Slava Kalyuga.  Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for Affective Computing , 2011, FLAIRS.

[16]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays , 2011 .

[17]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Fostering Self-Regulated Learning through ICT , 2010 .

[18]  J. Sweller.  Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances , 2010 .

[19]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[20]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[21]  Anne M. Poliquin,et al.  Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning , 2008 .

[22]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques , 2008 .

[23]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[24]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[25]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[26]  Mark Torrance,et al.  The Teachability and Effectiveness of Cognitive Self-Regulation in Sixth-Grade Writers. , 2007 .

[27]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Visualization Tools, Argumentation Schemes and Expert Opinion Evidence in Law , 2007 .

[28]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? * , 2006 .

[29]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[30]  Chris Reed,et al.  On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments , 2004 .

[31]  A. Braet.  The Oldest Typology of Argumentation Schemes , 2004 .

[32]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits , 2003 .

[33]  M. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[34]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  The development of epistemological understanding , 2000 .

[36]  Leo Groarke,et al.  Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics , 1999 .

[37]  R. Catrambone.  The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. , 1998 .

[38]  David W. Smith,et al.  From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essays , 1998 .

[39]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[40]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[41]  R. T. Kellogg.  Effectiveness of prewritting strategies as a function of task demands , 1990 .

[42]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[43]  D. Kuhn.  Education for Thinking , 1986, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[44]  L. Flower.  Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[45]  Karen Strohm Kitchner.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[46]  N. Sommers.  Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[47]  Lillian S. Bridwell,et al.  Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing , 1980, Research in the Teaching of English.

[48]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[49]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[50]  Y. Dori,et al.  Metacognition in science education : trends in current research , 2012 .

[51]  A. Zohar,et al.  Metacognition in Science Education , 2012 .

[52]  Michael H. G. Hoffmann,et al.  Analyzing Framing Processes in Conflicts and Communication by Means of Logical Argument Mapping , 2011 .

[53]  Steven C. Fleisher,et al.  Book Review: Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications by Edited by Dale H. Schunk and Barry J. Zimmerman (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008) , 2009 .

[54]  D. Kuhn.  The skills of argument: Contents , 1991 .

[55]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[56]  John Gastil,et al.  The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Civic Engagement In The Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[57]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Insights from Instructional Research on Revision with Struggling Writers , 2004 .

[58]  Jan Van Bruggen,et al.  A Cognitive Framework for Cooperative Problem Solving with Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[59]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[60]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of , 2000 .

[61]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice , 1998 .

[62]  J. Pollock.  Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person , 1995 .

[63]  D. Walton.  Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[64]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[65]  Peter A. Facione,et al.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report) , 1990 .

[66]  T. Govier.  A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[67]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[68]  S. Frederick,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .