Design and Testing of a Compliant Mechanism-Based Demonstrator for a Droop-Nose Morphing Device

A demonstrator morphing leading edge was designed and manufactured as an intermediary step in preparation for wind tunnel testing of a droop-nose adaptive morphing wingtip (AMWT) as part of the European FP7 project NOVEMOR. This demonstrator features a flexible fiberglass skin and a monolithic aluminum internal compliant mechanism and support structure for lightweight design. The design process involves the design of the skin via a structural optimization tool, followed by continuum gradient-based topology optimization of first the compliant mechanism and then the support structure. The skin was manufactured using prepreg Hexcel HexPly® 913 plies, the aluminum internal structure was laser cut from stock plate material and the compliant region was driven by a linear stepper motor actuator. Displacements and strains were measured and compared with target values and that of finite element computations and overall show good agreement; however issues such as grey-areas and hinge-regions in the topology optimization need to be addressed for the final wind tunnel design for better post-processing and reduced stress concentrations.

[1]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Topological Optimization of Compliant Adaptive Wing Structure , 2009 .

[2]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes , 2003 .

[3]  Martin Wiedemann,et al.  Design of a Smart Leading Edge Device , 2013 .

[4]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Morphing Devices for a Wing and Wingtip Based on Compliant Structures , 2014 .

[5]  Johannes Riemenschneider,et al.  Evaluation of a Compliant Droop-Nose Morphing Wing Tip via Experimental Tests , 2017 .

[6]  Liyong Tong,et al.  Shape morphing of laminated composite structures with photostrictive actuators via topology optimization , 2011 .

[7]  Z. Kang,et al.  Integrated Optimization of Material Layout and Control Voltage for Piezoelectric Laminated Plates , 2008 .

[8]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[9]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  A Process Chain for Structural Optimization of a Smart Droop Nose for an Active Blown High Lift System , 2014 .

[10]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[11]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design , 2006 .

[12]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[13]  G.A.A. Thuwis,et al.  Stiffness and Layout Tailoring of a Morphing High-lift System with Aeroelastic Loads , 2012 .

[14]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[15]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  A Two-Level Approach for the Optimal Design of Morphing Wings Based On Compliant Structures , 2011 .

[16]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology synthesis of large‐displacement compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[17]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .