Personalized Legibility of an Indoor Environment for People with Motor Disabilities: A New Framework

A mental map refers to the personalized representation of spatial knowledge in the human brain and is based on the perceptions, experiences, and interactions of people with their environment. For people with motor disabilities (PWMD) some perceptions and interactions with the environment during their mobility occur in different ways and consequently lead to different mental maps. For example, these people perceive and interact differently with elevators, escalators, and steps during their mobility. Hence, their perceptions of the level of complexity and the legibility of an environment may be different. Legibility of an environment is an indicator that measures the level of complexity and the ease of understanding of that environment by a person. In the literature, legibility is mostly estimated based on the environmental factors such as visibility, connectivity, and layout complexity for a given space. However, the role of personal factors (e.g., capacities) is rarely considered in the legibility assessment, which complicates its personalization. This paper aims at studying the influence of personal factors on the evaluation of the legibility of indoor environments for PWMD. In addition to the visibility, the connectivity, and the complexity of indoor environments, we also integrate the influence of the level of accessibility (i.e., presence of facilitators and obstacles) in the legibility assessment process. The Quebec City Convention Centre is selected as our study area and the legibility of this building is quantified. We show how the integration of the above-mentioned factors can influence the legibility for PWMD and hence their mobility performance in those environments.

[1]  Puneet Sharma,et al.  Evaluating Visual Saliency Algorithms: Past, Present and Future , 2015 .

[2]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[3]  Reda Yaagoubi,et al.  AccessVOR: A Semantically Enriched Voronoï-Based Approach for Navigation Assistance of Wheelchair Users in Indoor Environments , 2019, Journal of Navigation.

[4]  Louisa Dahmani,et al.  Wayfinding: The effects of large displays and 3-D perception , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[5]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Quantifying Legibility of Indoor Spaces Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: Case Studies in Train Stations , 2019, Building and Environment.

[6]  Jordan Carver,et al.  The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  Geoffrey Edwards,et al.  Cognitive design in action: developing assistive technology for situational awareness for persons who are blind , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[8]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[9]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[10]  Kiyun Yu,et al.  Data Model for IndoorGML Extension to Support Indoor Navigation of People with Mobility Disabilities , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[11]  Lamine Mahdjoubi,et al.  Automated construction of variable density navigable networks in a 3D indoor environment for emergency response , 2016 .

[12]  Geoffrey Edwards,et al.  The Role of Social Factors in the Accessibility of Urban Areas for People with Motor Disabilities , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[13]  Nejah Nasri,et al.  3D indoor redeployment in IoT collection networks: a real prototyping using a hybrid PI-NSGA-III-VF , 2018, 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[14]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Medial Axis Transformation of a Planar Shape , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Ramon Baldrich,et al.  Saliency of color image derivatives: a comparison between computational models and human perception. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Evaluation of a Conceptual Model of Architectural Legibility , 1991 .

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Greeno Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[19]  Alice B. Krueger,et al.  Health care experiences and perceptions among people with and without disabilities. , 2016, Disability and health journal.

[20]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[22]  G. Edwards,et al.  The Disability Creation Process Model: A Comprehensive Explanation of Disabling Situations as a Guide to Developing Policy and Service Programs , 2019, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research.

[23]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  From Isovists via Mental Representations to Behaviour: First Steps toward Closing the Causal Chain , 2007 .

[24]  Cyril Ray,et al.  Spatial models for context-aware indoor navigation systems: A survey , 2012, J. Spatial Inf. Sci..

[25]  Sabine Timpf,et al.  On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[26]  Jerry Weisman,et al.  Evaluating Architectural Legibility , 1981 .

[27]  Nandana Welage,et al.  Wheelchair accessibility of public buildings: a review of the literature , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[28]  Rui Li,et al.  Wayfinding Behaviors in Complex Buildings , 2016 .

[29]  C. Carrera,et al.  Spatial-Thinking Knowledge Acquisition from Route-Based Learning and Survey Learning: Improvement of Spatial Orientation Skill with Geographic Information Science Sources , 2017 .

[30]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Indoor Human Navigation Systems: A Survey , 2013, Interact. Comput..