Geometric Separation using a Wavelet-Shearlet Dictionary

Astronomical images of galaxies can be modeled as a superposition of pointlike and curvelike structures. Astronomers typically face the problem of extracting those components as accurate as possible. Although this problem seems unsolvable – as there are two unknowns for every datum – suggestive empirical results have been achieved by employing a dictionary consisting of wavelets and curvelets combined with `1 minimization techniques. In this paper we present a theoretical analysis in a model problem showing that accurate geometric separation can be achieved by `1 minimization. We introduce the notions of cluster coherence and clustered sparse objects as a machinery to show that the underdetermined system of equations can be stably solved by `1 minimization. We prove that not only a radial wavelet-curvelet dictionary achieves nearly-perfect separation at all sufficiently fine scales, but, in particular, also an orthonormal wavelet-shearlet dictionary, thereby proposing this dictionary as an interesting alternative for geometric separation of pointlike and curvelike structures. To derive this final result we show that curvelets and shearlets are sparsity equivalent in the sense of a finite p-norm (0 < p ≤ 1) of the cross-Grammian matrix.

[1]  D. Labate,et al.  Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets , 2006, math/0605375.

[2]  Bruno Torrésani,et al.  Sparsity and persistence: mixed norms provide simple signal models with dependent coefficients , 2009, Signal Image Video Process..

[3]  Michael Elad,et al.  Submitted to Ieee Transactions on Image Processing Image Decomposition via the Combination of Sparse Representations and a Variational Approach , 2022 .

[4]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  Microlocal Analysis of the Geometric Separation Problem , 2010, ArXiv.

[5]  Michael Elad,et al.  From Sparse Solutions of Systems of Equations to Sparse Modeling of Signals and Images , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[6]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Multi-layered image representation: application to image compression , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[7]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous Curvelet Transform : I . Resolution of the Wavefront Set , 2003 .

[8]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Multilayered image representation: application to image compression , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  Sparsity Equivalence of Anisotropic Decompositions , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  D. Donoho,et al.  Simultaneous cartoon and texture image inpainting using morphological component analysis (MCA) , 2005 .

[13]  D. Labate,et al.  Sparse Multidimensional Representations using Anisotropic Dilation and Shear Operators , 2006 .

[14]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous curvelet transform , 2003 .

[15]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Wavelets and Adapted Waveform Analy-sis: A Toolkit for Signal Processing and Numerical Analysis , 1993 .

[18]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous curvelet transform: II. Discretization and frames , 2005 .