Computer adaptive testing, big data and algorithmic approaches to education

Abstract This article critically considers the promise of computer adaptive testing (CAT) and digital data to provide better and quicker data that will improve the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of schooling. In particular, it uses the case of the Australian NAPLAN test that will become an online, adaptive test from 2016. The article argues that CATs are specific examples of technological ensembles which are producing, and working through, new subjectivities. In particular, CATs leverage opportunities for big data and algorithmic approaches to education that are symptomatic of what Deleuze saw as the shift from disciplinary to control institutions and societies.

[1]  Nicole Mockler.  Simple solutions to complex problems: moral panic and the fluid shift from ‘equity’ to ‘quality’ in education , 2014 .

[2]  S. Ball.  The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity , 2003 .

[3]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A conceptual map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[4]  David Savat,et al.  Deleuze's Objectile: From Discipline to Modulation , 2009 .

[5]  Kristen E. DiCerbo,et al.  Impacts of the Digital Ocean on Education , 2014 .

[6]  Alexander Galloway,et al.  Protocol, Control, and Networks , 2004, Grey Room.

[7]  Edward S. Shapiro,et al.  Comparing Computer-Adaptive and Curriculum-Based Measurement Methods of Assessment , 2012 .

[8]  William Bogard,et al.  Deleuze and Machines: A Politics of Technology? , 2005 .

[9]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[10]  Sam Sellar,et al.  Network Restructuring Of Global Edu-Business , 2015 .

[11]  Sam Sellar,et al.  Data infrastructure: a review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education , 2015 .

[12]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  A Semiparametric Model for Jointly Analyzing Response Times and Accuracy in Computerized Testing , 2013 .

[13]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[14]  David Savat,et al.  Uncoding the Digital , 2013 .

[15]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .

[16]  Paul Virilio.  Speed and Politics: An Essay on Dromology , 1986 .

[17]  Ben Williamson,et al.  Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments , 2016 .

[18]  Ben Williamson.  Governing software: networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education , 2015 .

[19]  Ian Cook,et al.  Manipulating the data: teaching and NAPLAN in the control society , 2014 .

[20]  Glenn C. Savage,et al.  Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: the effects of testing and data infrastructures , 2014 .

[21]  M. Lazzarato.  The Concepts of Life and the Living in the Societies of Control1 , 2006 .

[22]  David Savat,et al.  Introduction: Deleuze and New Technology , 2009 .

[23]  Anna Hogan,et al.  Networks, new governance and education , 2012 .

[24]  Ian Cook,et al.  Education policy-making and time , 2014 .

[25]  David Savat,et al.  Uncoding the Digital: Technology, Subjectivity and Action in the Control Society , 2012 .

[26]  John Cheney-Lippold,et al.  A New Algorithmic Identity , 2011 .

[27]  Sam Sellar,et al.  A feel for numbers: affect, data and education policy , 2015, The Education Assemblage.

[28]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[29]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Data entry: towards the critical study of digital data and education , 2015 .

[30]  Margaret Wu,et al.  What National Testing Data can Tell us , 2015 .

[31]  Ian Cook,et al.  The logic of data-sense: thinking through Learning Personalisation , 2017 .

[32]  A. Galloway.  Are Some Things Unrepresentable? , 2011 .

[33]  Greg Thompson,et al.  Local Experiences, Global Similarities : Teacher perceptions of the impacts of national testing , 2015 .

[34]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  'Big Data', the 'Internet of Things' and the 'Internet of Signs' , 2013, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[35]  Ian Hardy,et al.  Education as a ‘risky business’: Theorising student and teacher learning in complex times , 2015 .

[36]  N. Rose.  Government and control , 2000 .

[37]  Patrick Crogan,et al.  Bernard Stiegler: Philosophy, Technics, and Activism , 2010 .

[38]  Sam Sellar,et al.  ‘Catalyst data’: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling , 2013 .

[39]  Bernard Stiegler,et al.  Teleologics of the Snail , 2009 .

[40]  Sotiria Grek,et al.  Governing education through data: Scotland, England and the European education policy space , 2009 .

[41]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows , 2011 .

[42]  Gilles Deleuze,et al.  Empiricism and subjectivity : an essay on Hume's theory of human nature , 1991 .