Nanoscale nuclear architecture for cancer diagnosis beyond pathology via spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy.

Definitive diagnosis of malignancy is often challenging due to limited availability of human cell or tissue samples and morphological similarity with certain benign conditions. Our recently developed novel technology-spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy (SL-QPM)-overcomes the technical difficulties and enables us to obtain quantitative information about cell nuclear architectural characteristics with nanoscale sensitivity. We explore its ability to improve the identification of malignancy, especially in cytopathologically non-cancerous-appearing cells. We perform proof-of-concept experiments with an animal model of colorectal carcinogenesis-APC(Min) mouse model and human cytology specimens of colorectal cancer. We show the ability of in situ nanoscale nuclear architectural characteristics in identifying cancerous cells, especially in those labeled as "indeterminate or normal" by expert cytopathologists. Our approach is based on the quantitative analysis of the cell nucleus on the original cytology slides without additional processing, which can be readily applied in a conventional clinical setting. Our simple and practical optical microscopy technique may lead to the development of novel methods for early detection of cancer.

[1]  and P R Laughlin,et al.  Diffusive Interfacial Transport: A New Approach to Concentrated Protein Solution Studies , 2001 .

[2]  Daniele Zink,et al.  Nuclear structure in cancer cells , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  K. Nugent,et al.  Quantitative optical phase microscopy. , 1998, Optics letters.

[4]  Jun Zhang,et al.  High-dynamic-range quantitative phase imaging with spectral domain phase microscopy. , 2009, Optics letters.

[5]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Elastic backscattering spectroscopic microscopy. , 2005, Optics letters.

[6]  Natan T Shaked,et al.  Dual-interference-channel quantitative-phase microscopy of live cell dynamics. , 2009, Optics letters.

[7]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy for cancer diagnosis. , 2010, Optics letters.

[8]  J. L. García-Muñiz,et al.  Cell cycle flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis and management of colorectal carcinoma. , 1999, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[9]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[10]  Taner Akkin,et al.  Spectral-domain optical coherence phase microscopy for quantitative phase-contrast imaging. , 2005, Optics letters.

[11]  Taner Akkin,et al.  Quantitative phase-contrast imaging of cells with phase-sensitive optical coherence microscopy. , 2004, Optics letters.

[12]  P. Ferraro,et al.  Quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by a lateral shear approach to digital holographic image reconstruction. , 2006, Optics letters.

[13]  D. Ahlquist Molecular detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[14]  R. Barer,et al.  Refractive Index of Concentrated Protein Solutions , 1954, Nature.

[15]  B. Konety,et al.  Nuclear structural proteins as biomarkers of cancer , 1999, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[16]  D. S. Coffey Self-organization, complexity and chaos: The new biology for medicine , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Marinko Sarunic,et al.  Full-field swept-source phase microscopy , 2006, SPIE BiOS.

[18]  R. Dasari,et al.  Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics. , 2006, Optics letters.

[19]  Gregory F. Sterrett,et al.  Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology , 2006 .

[20]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Nuclear dreams: The malignant alteration of nuclear architecture , 1998, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[21]  J. Underwood,et al.  Pathology of the Nucleus , 1990, Current Topics in Pathology.