Models for Improving the Targeting and Implementation of Biological Control of Weeds1

Abstract Managers are faced with considerable uncertainty about the systems they manage; yet, they are still expected to optimize weed management. A wide variety of mathematical models can be used to improve the efficacy and implementation of biocontrol for invasive plants. In this article, applied insights that have been generated by mathematical models of biological control systems are described. First, the ways in which models can be used to help choose appropriate agents for biocontrol are outlined. In particular, a novel example showing how demographic and dispersal models can be linked to address the life-history stage to target to reduce either local abundance or spatial spread of weeds is presented. Second, the use of stochastic optimization models to improve biological control release and redistribution strategies is reviewed. The discussion outlines the way in which learning about uncertainties can be explicitly included in the management process. These two topics demonstrate the use of ecological models for improving the targeting and implementation of biological control of weeds. Additional index words: Optimization, release strategies, spatial spread, uncertainty. Abbreviation: AAM, active adaptive management.

[1]  C. Kolar,et al.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  J. Memmott,et al.  The effect of release size on the probability of establishment of biological control agents: gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) released against gorse (Ulex europaeus) in New Zealand , 1998 .

[3]  R E McFadyen,et al.  Biological control of weeds. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[4]  H. P. Possingham,et al.  State-Dependent Decision Analysis for Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[5]  J. Waage,et al.  Predictive modelling in biological control : the mango mealy bug (Rastrococcus invadens) and its parasitoids , 1991 .

[6]  P. McEvoy,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT INVADERS: REGIONAL PATTERNS, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, AND STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS , 1999 .

[7]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Ecological Effects of an Insect Introduced for the Biological Control of Weeds , 1997 .

[8]  K. Shea,et al.  Modeling for Management of Invasive Species: Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) in New Zealand1 , 2004 .

[9]  J. D. Kerr,et al.  Biological control of weeds: an evaluation , 1984 .

[10]  C. Briggs Competition Among Parasitoid Species on a Stage-Structured Host and Its Effect on Host Suppression , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Katriona Shea,et al.  ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .

[12]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[13]  Hal Caswell,et al.  DEMOGRAPHY AND DISPERSAL: CALCULATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF INVASION SPEED FOR STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[14]  W. Fagan,et al.  Invasion theory and biological control , 2002 .

[15]  Małgorzata Krasińska,et al.  POPULATION MANAGEMENT , 2012 .

[16]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions , 1993 .

[17]  C. Clausen,et al.  Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds : a world review , 1978 .

[18]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[19]  M. Julien,et al.  Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds , 1992 .

[20]  J. Lawton,et al.  Characteristics of successful natural enemies in models of biological control of insect pests , 1978, Nature.

[21]  Fritzi S. Grevstad,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE CHANCE OF POPULATION ESTABLISHMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR RELEASE STRATEGIES IN BIOCONTROL , 1999 .

[22]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Theory for Biological Control: Recent Developments , 1996 .

[23]  K Shea,et al.  Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  M. Crawley,et al.  Correlates of Introduction Success in Exotic New Zealand Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN INSECT PEST AND WEED CONTROL: INTERVENTION WITH A PLAN FOR LEARNING , 2002 .