Out-of-plane shaking table tests on URM single leaf and cavity walls

Abstract Damage observations from recent seismic events have confirmed that the activation of out-of-plane local mechanisms is one of the major causes of structural collapse in unreinforced masonry buildings. Particularly vulnerable are cavity walls commonly used in residential building in regions such as Central and Northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, China and several other countries. Usually, the inner leaf has a load-bearing function, carrying vertical loads transmitted by floors and roof while the outer leaf, having only aesthetic and insulation functions, is lightly loaded. The two leaves are typically connected by means of metallic ties. The high out-of-plane vulnerability, which may prevent the exploitation of the global capacity associated with the in-plane capacity of the structural walls, is mainly due to the high slenderness of the masonry leaves and the lack, or ineffectiveness, of ties between leaves. Often ties are too widely spaced and/or heavily degraded. Despite the complexity of the composite behaviour of such a construction typology, no dynamic tests on cavity walls are reported in current literature. For this reason, four out-of-plane shaking table tests were conducted on full-scale unreinforced masonry assemblies of three cavity wall panels with different tie distributions (inner calcium silicate brick wall and outer clay brick wall) and one single-leaf wall constructed using calcium silicate brick masonry. The experimental arrangement allowed the specimens to be tested under different input signals and loading conditions, inducing an out-of-plane one-way bending action in the walls. The research is aimed at understanding the seismic behaviour of cavity walls, their failure mechanisms and how they are affected by boundary conditions and degree of connection between the two leaves. The paper describes the main experimental results, including deformed shapes, damage patterns, force-displacement relationships, and the capacities in term of acceleration sustained by the specimens. Additionally, the energy dissipation involved in the mechanism has been investigated in terms of coefficient of restitution and damping ratio. All the processed data are freely available upon request (see http://www.eucentre.it/nam-project ).

[1]  Michael C. Griffith,et al.  Out‐of‐plane seismic response of vertically spanning URM walls connected to flexible diaphragms , 2016 .

[2]  Francesca da Porto,et al.  Construction Details and Observed Earthquake Performance of Unreinforced Clay Brick Masonry Cavity-walls , 2016 .

[3]  Jason Ingham,et al.  In situ out-of-plane testing of unreinforced masonry cavity walls in as-built and improved conditions , 2015 .

[4]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift , 1983 .

[5]  Omar AlShawa,et al.  The relevance of energy damping in unreinforced masonry rocking mechanisms. Experimental and analytic investigations , 2011 .

[6]  G. Housner The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .

[7]  Alexandre A. Costa,et al.  Free rocking response of a regular stone masonry wall with equivalent block approach: experimental and analytical evaluation , 2013 .

[8]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Experimental characterisation of calcium-silicate brick masonry for seismic assessment , 2016 .

[9]  Michael C. Griffith,et al.  Seismic assessment of out-of-plane loaded unreinforced masonry walls in multi-storey buildings , 2014 .

[10]  Michael C. Griffith,et al.  The vertical spanning strip wall as a coupled rocking rigid body assembly , 2008 .

[11]  Humberto Varum,et al.  A simplified four-branch model for the analytical study of the out-of-plane performance of regular stone URM walls , 2015 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Elwood,et al.  Out-of-Plane Dynamic Stability of Unreinforced Masonry Walls in One-Way Bending: Shake Table Testing , 2016 .

[13]  Nicos Makris,et al.  The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies , 2003 .

[14]  M. Aslam,et al.  Rocking and overturning response of rigid bodies to earthquake motions: A report of an analytical and experimental study on the rocking and overturning response of rigid blocks to simultaneous horizontal and vertical accelerations , 1978 .

[15]  Nelson Lam,et al.  Time–history analysis of URM walls in out-of-plane flexure , 2003 .

[16]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake , 2011 .

[17]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[18]  Michael C. Griffith Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings During the Newcastle Earthquake, Australia , 1991 .

[19]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Dynamically equivalent rocking structures , 2014 .

[20]  A Giuffre,et al.  A Mechanical Model for Statics and Dynamics of Historical Masonry Buildings , 1996 .

[21]  A. Penna,et al.  A single degree of freedom model for the simulation of the out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry walls , 2015 .

[22]  C. E. Ventura,et al.  Shake table tests on the out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry wallsThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on Masonry. , 2007 .

[23]  Michael C. Griffith,et al.  Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings During the 2010 Darfield (Christchurch, Nz) Earthquake , 2010 .