Digital games as sources for science analogies: Learning about energy through play

Abstract Many research studies have focused on how game designs informed by learning theory can benefit students; fewer explore what needs to happen during instruction for students to translate what they learn in games into disciplinary knowledge. In this study, researchers examined whether instructional techniques that support visual mapping of analogies can help students translate game learning to science learning. The three digital games used in the study were designed to have images and actions that are analogous to photosynthesis, electricity, and heat transfer, topics that all relate to the larger crosscutting concept of energy transfer. We hypothesized that these digital games could serve as compelling, visual sources for analogies, but that teachers would need to explicitly map the relationships between the game visuals and the target science concepts for students to learn those concepts. Our study compared student learning outcomes from an intervention that combined digital gameplay with analogy mapping to outcomes from an intervention that used the same digital games without analogy mapping. We found that students who experienced analogy mapping learned more as measured by assessments of electricity and energy transfer. Findings from this study provide practical recommendations for integrating digital games into classroom instruction, as well as insights into how explicit analogical mapping supports sense-making and measurable progress toward accurate conceptual knowledge of complex scientific phenomena.

[1]  Rebecca Maynard,et al.  PowerUp!: A Tool for Calculating Minimum Detectable Effect Sizes and Minimum Required Sample Sizes for Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design Studies , 2013 .

[2]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms , 2013 .

[3]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[4]  D. Bacon The Contributions of Reliability and Pretests to Effective Assessment , 2004 .

[5]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Does individual or collaborative self-debriefing better enhance learning from games? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relational Categories are More Mutable than Entity Categories , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Josianne Basque,et al.  Logs Analysis of Adapted Pedagogical Scenarios Generated by a Simulation Serious Game Architecture , 2017, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[8]  Victor Law,et al.  Promoting science learning in game-based learning with question prompts and feedback , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Bryan J. Matlen,et al.  Analogical Reasoning in the Classroom: Insights from Cognitive Science. , 2015 .

[10]  Allison J. Jaeger,et al.  When, and for whom, analogies help: The role of spatial skills and interleaved presentation. , 2016 .

[11]  Elizabeth A. Stuart,et al.  The Nonuse, Misuse, and Proper Use of Pilot Studies in Experimental Evaluation Research , 2017 .

[12]  M. Chi Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[13]  Jodi Asbell-Clarke,et al.  Building Bridges: Teachers Leveraging Game-Based Implicit Science Learning in Physics Classrooms , 2016 .

[14]  M. P. Jacob Habgood,et al.  Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games , 2011 .

[15]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Measuring Knowledge Integration Learning of Energy Topics: A two-year longitudinal study , 2015 .

[16]  Luli Stern,et al.  Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards , 2002 .

[17]  Esra Özay,et al.  Secondary students' interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition , 2003 .

[18]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Analogical gestures foster understanding of causal systems , 2017, CogSci.

[19]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Good Video Games + Good Learning: collected essays on video games, learning and literacy , 2013 .

[20]  P. Wouters,et al.  A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games , 2013 .

[21]  Debbie Denise Reese,et al.  Video game learning dynamics: Actionable measures of multidimensional learning trajectories , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  Metaphor is like analogy , 2001 .

[23]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[24]  Nina K Simms,et al.  Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[25]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Our Princess Is in Another Castle , 2012 .

[26]  Melissa Gresalfi,et al.  Teaching with Videogames: How Experience Impacts Classroom Integration , 2017, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[27]  M. Hillemeier,et al.  Science Achievement Gaps Begin Very Early, Persist, and Are Largely Explained by Modifiable Factors , 2016 .

[28]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Applied Missing Data Analysis , 2010 .

[29]  K. Begolli,et al.  Analogy and Higher Order Thinking , 2016 .

[30]  Ina Blau,et al.  Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[31]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Cognitive Supports for Analogies in the Mathematics Classroom , 2007, Science.

[32]  Cari F. Herrmann-Abell,et al.  Using Distractor-Driven Standards-Based Multiple-Choice Assessments and Rasch Modeling to Investigate Hierarchies of Chemistry Misconceptions and Detect Structural Problems with Individual Items. , 2011 .

[33]  T. Haladyna Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items , 1994 .

[34]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[35]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  The Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning From Analogies in Science Texts , 2010 .

[36]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Associations among scaffold presentation, reward mechanisms and problem-solving behaviors in game play , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Gregory C. R. Yates,et al.  Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn , 2013 .

[38]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[39]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Digital Games, Design, and Learning , 2016, Review of educational research.

[40]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning , 2011 .

[41]  Deborah I Thompson,et al.  Chapter 7 – What Type of Narrative do Children Prefer in Active Video Games? An Exploratory Study of Cognitive and Emotional Responses , 2016 .

[42]  Gary King,et al.  Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data , 2011 .

[43]  D. Rubin Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys , 1989 .

[44]  Ji Yeon Son,et al.  Relational Priming Based on a Multiplicative Schema for Whole Numbers and Fractions , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  B. Andersson Pupils' Conceptions of Matter and its Transformations (age 12-16) , 1990 .

[46]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Translating the Statistical Representation of the Effects of Education Interventions Into More Readily Interpretable Forms , 2012 .

[47]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .