TeacherBridge : Knowledge Management in Communities of Practice

The TeacherBridge (Basic Resources for Integrated Distributed Group Environments) motivates collaboration and supports online tools for teachers’ professional resource management by providing a socio-technical infrastructure for community networks. While this project focuses initially on local science and mathematics teachers, resources developed are designed to be globally diffused to a wide variety of online communities. This paper discusses the characteristics of online communities of educators and how home networking technology and knowledge management systems can support collaboration and knowledge sharing in such communities. We study examples of existing and well-known online communities of educators and introduce our own system, TeacherBridge, which supports teacher professional development by supporting peer-based collaboration and community. We also analyze and evaluate the characteristics of TeacherBridge with activity theory [12] and minimalism [37]. Activity theory provides an analytical framework for how TeacherBridge can be used as a socio-technical infrastructure for online communities of educators; minimalism guides the development of successful online communities that are easily accessible and facilitate teacher participation in knowledge sharing activities

[1]  J. Piaget,et al.  The equilibration of cognitive structures : the central problem of intellectual development , 1985 .

[2]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[3]  G. Collins,et al.  Transcending inductive category formation in learning , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  James Hiebert Missing Links@@@Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics , 1987 .

[5]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Do Written Instructions Need Examples , 1986 .

[6]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning , 1988 .

[7]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning, working and imagining : twelve studies in activity theory , 1990 .

[8]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Smalltalk scaffolding: a case study of minimalist instruction , 1990, CHI '90.

[9]  A. Dillon,et al.  A survey of usability engineering within the European I . T . Industry – Current practice and needs , 1993 .

[10]  M. R. Kibby,et al.  Teaching teachers to use HyperCard: a minimal manual approach , 1993, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  T. Somers,et al.  Telecommuting: problems associated with communications technologies and their capabilities , 1995 .

[12]  Computer supported cooperative work: The journal of collaborative computing , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[13]  R. Grice Minimalism Beyond the Nurnberg Funnel , 1998 .

[14]  David Wasserman The Activity Checklist : A Tool for Representing the “ Space ” of Context , 1999 .

[15]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  From MOO to MEOW: domesticating technology for online communities , 1999, CSCL.

[16]  S. Mann Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  Bonnie Langford Schmidt You can go home again: successful telecommuting for the technical communicator , 2000, SIGDOC.

[18]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Measurement in action: an activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Bonnie Langford Schmidt You can go home again: successful telecommuting for the technical communicator , 2000, 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation. ipcc sigdoc 2000. Technology and Teamwork. Proceedings. IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference an.

[20]  Hunter Gehlbach,et al.  Assessing the Impact of a Large-Scale Online Teacher Professional Development Community , 2000 .

[21]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  A study on the usage of computer and communication technologies for telecommuting , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[22]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Beyond Adoption to Invention: Teacher-Created Collaborative Activities in Higher Education , 2001 .

[23]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum , 2001 .

[24]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Cooperation in massively distributed information space , 2001, ECSCW.

[25]  Debora Weber-Wulff,et al.  Human-computer interaction in the new millennium , 2002, SOEN.

[26]  Scott McCoy,et al.  The most important issues in knowledge management , 2002, CACM.

[27]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: Evolution of an Online Education Community of Practice , 2002 .

[28]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Common Ground in Electronically Mediated Communication: Clark's Theory of Language Use , 2003 .

[29]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database , 2003 .

[30]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice: Are We Putting the Cart Before the Horse? , 2003 .

[31]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community , 2004 .

[32]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).