Structural constraints on pronoun binding and coreference: evidence from eye movements during reading

A number of recent studies have investigated how syntactic and non-syntactic constraints combine to cue memory retrieval during anaphora resolution. In this paper we investigate how syntactic constraints and gender congruence interact to guide memory retrieval during the resolution of subject pronouns. Subject pronouns are always technically ambiguous, and the application of syntactic constraints on their interpretation depends on properties of the antecedent that is to be retrieved. While pronouns can freely corefer with non-quantified referential antecedents, linking a pronoun to a quantified antecedent is only possible in certain syntactic configurations via variable binding. We report the results from a judgment task and three online reading comprehension experiments investigating pronoun resolution with quantified and non-quantified antecedents. Results from both the judgment task and participants' eye movements during reading indicate that comprehenders freely allow pronouns to corefer with non-quantified antecedents, but that retrieval of quantified antecedents is restricted to specific syntactic environments. We interpret our findings as indicating that syntactic constraints constitute highly weighted cues to memory retrieval during anaphora resolution.

[1]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[2]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[3]  Vera Heyer,et al.  Reflexive anaphor resolution in spoken language comprehension: structural constraints and beyond , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Ian Cunnings,et al.  Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives , 2014 .

[5]  E. Reuland Primitives of Binding , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[6]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Children's Processing of Reflexives and Pronouns in English: Evidence from Eye-movements During Listening , 2011 .

[7]  C. Phillips,et al.  Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain and Language.

[8]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Proper Names as Controllers of Discourse Focus , 1988 .

[9]  T. Reinhart Anaphora and semantic interpretation , 1983 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[11]  C. Phillips,et al.  Relation-sensitive retrieval: Evidence from bound variable pronouns , 2015 .

[12]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence , 2013 .

[13]  C. Felser,et al.  The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[15]  C. Felser,et al.  The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives , 2013 .

[16]  Chris Barker,et al.  Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[18]  Donna Jo Napoli,et al.  Agreement and anaphora : a study of the role of pronouns in syntax and discourse , 1985 .

[19]  Eric Reuland,et al.  Anaphora and Language Design , 2011 .

[20]  Arnout Koornneef,et al.  Eye-catching Anaphora , 2008 .

[21]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[22]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora , 2007 .

[23]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Bound Variables and C‐Command , 2002, J. Semant..

[24]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[25]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[26]  Dave W. Kush,et al.  Respecting Relations: Memory Access and Antecedent Retrieval in Incremental Sentence Processing , 2013 .

[27]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[28]  Ian Cunnings,et al.  Variable Binding and Coreference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye-Movements. , 2014 .

[29]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[32]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[33]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.