If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities

This study examines virtual community quality through sociolinguistics theory. According to sociolinguistics, in oral discourse men communicate to establish superior social standing, while women communicate with the undertone of rapport, compassion, and empathy. The study shows that these differences carry over to the asynchronous written environment of virtual communities and affect men's and women's respective perceptions of community quality. Women go to virtual communities to give and to get social support and have a more favorable assessment of the capability of others. This pattern generally holds even when comparing mostly single-gender communities and mixed-gender communities. However, a closer look at these differences reveals a more complex picture, with undertones in mixed-gender communities being less than in their respective mostly single-gender communities.

[1]  J. S. Hallett,et al.  “Uh-huh. What's That All About?” , 1998 .

[2]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Predictors of online buying behavior , 1999, CACM.

[4]  Carole Edelsky.  Who's got the floor? , 1981, Language in Society.

[5]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[6]  Jennifer Coates,et al.  Women in their speech communities : new perspectives on language and sex , 1988 .

[7]  T. Gladwin.  Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1981 .

[8]  David Gefen,et al.  Assessing Unidimensionality Through LISREL: An Explanation and an Example , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  W. Kilbourne,et al.  A socio-economic perspective on gender bias in technology , 1997 .

[10]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Small Insults: A Study of Interruptions in Cross-Sex Conversations between Unaquainted Persons , 1983 .

[11]  Robert Davison,et al.  An instrument for measuring meeting success , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[13]  D. H. Zimmerman,et al.  9. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation , 1996 .

[14]  Diane F. Witmer,et al.  From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard , 1970 .

[15]  J. Coates.  Women, men, and language , 1986 .

[16]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Book Reviews : Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future , 1984 .

[18]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[20]  Bent Preisler.  The tentative female , 1987 .

[21]  R. Kraut,et al.  Using E-mail for Personal Relationships , 2001 .

[22]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 1998, DATB.

[23]  Deborah Cameron,et al.  Feminism and linguistic theory , 1985 .

[24]  J. House.  Work stress and social support , 1981 .

[25]  K. Hawkins,et al.  Gender Differences in Questions Asked During Small Decision-Making Group Discussions , 1999 .

[26]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups , 2006 .

[28]  S. Murray.  You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[29]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  N. Sussman,et al.  Sex and power: gender differences in computer-mediated interactions , 2000 .

[31]  C. Leaper,et al.  Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How , 1998 .

[32]  Malcah Yaeger-Dror,et al.  Factors Influencing the Contrast between Men's and Women's Speech , 1998 .

[33]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Women's Talk in Public Contexts , 1992 .

[34]  Simeon Yates,et al.  Gender, language and CMC for education , 2001 .

[35]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The Four Tigers of Global E-Business Infrastructure: Strategies and Implications for Emerging Economies , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Talking Difference: On Gender and Language , 1995 .

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[38]  P. Costa,et al.  Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz,et al.  Considering sources and types of social support: A psychometric evaluation of the House and Wells (1978) instrument. , 2013 .

[40]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Ann Weatherall,et al.  Re-Visioning Gender and Language Research , 1998 .

[43]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[44]  D. Tannen.  The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why. , 1995 .

[45]  S. Herring.  Two variants of an electronic message schema , 1996 .

[46]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[47]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[48]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..