Reduction of interference effect by low spatial frequency information priming in an emotional Stroop task.

The affective prediction hypothesis assumes that visual expectation allows fast and accurate processing of emotional stimuli. The prediction corresponds to what an object is likely to be. It therefore facilitates its identification by setting aside what the object is unlikely to be. It has then been suggested that prediction might be inevitably associated with the inhibition of irrelevant possibilities concerning the object to identify. Several studies highlighted that the facilitation of emotional perception depends on low spatial frequency (LSF) extraction. However, most of them used paradigms in which only the object to identify was present in the scene. As a consequence, there have yet been no studies investigating the efficiency of prediction in the visual perception of stimuli among irrelevant information. In this study, we designed a novel priming emotional Stroop task in which participants had to identify emotional facial expressions (EFEs) presented along with a congruent or incongruent word. To further investigate the role of early extraction of LSF information in top-down prediction during emotion recognition, the target EFE was primed with the same EFE filtered in LSF or high spatial frequency (HSF). Results reveal a reduction of the Stroop interference in the LSF compared to the HSF priming condition, which supports that visual expectation, depending on early LSF information extraction, facilitates the inhibition of irrelevant information during emotion recognition.

[1]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[3]  Jason L. Chan,et al.  Word Wins Over Face: Emotional Stroop Effect Activates the Frontal Cortical Network , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? , 2011 .

[5]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[6]  M. Bar,et al.  Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  J. Friedman,et al.  Faster, stronger, lateralized: Low spatial frequency information supports face processing , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions , 2013 .

[9]  Moshe Bar,et al.  The proactive brain: memory for predictions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  M. Tarr,et al.  Micro-Valences: Perceiving Affective Valence in Everyday Objects , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[11]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[12]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions: Evidence from neural computation , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Leonid I. Perlovsky,et al.  Predictions and Incongruency in Object Recognition: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective , 2012, Detection and Identification of Rare Audiovisual Cues.

[14]  E. Rolls Précis of The brain and emotion. , 2000, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[15]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  An Active Inference view of cognitive control , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[16]  Moshe Bar,et al.  The resilience of object predictions: Early recognition across viewpoints and exemplars , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  Coordinating with the Future: The Anticipatory Nature of Representation , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[18]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Anticipation and anticipatory behavior , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[19]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  L'utilisation des contrastes dans l'analyse des données : Comment tester les hypothèses spécifiques dans la recherche en psychologie ? , 2005 .

[21]  Moshe Bar,et al.  See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemisphere-dependent holistic processing of familiar faces , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Are All Types of Expertise Created Equal? Car Experts Use Different Spatial Frequency Scales for Subordinate Categorization of Cars and Faces , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General © 2009 American Psychological Association , 2022 .

[25]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  Keep your hands crossed: the valence-by-left/right interaction is related to hand, not side, in an incongruent hand-response key assignment. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Are Coarse Scales Sufficient for Fast Detection of Visual Threat? , 2010, Psychological science.

[27]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Lundqvist,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion (KDEF): Identification under different display-duration conditions , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[30]  B. Miller,et al.  Double dissociation in the anatomy of socioemotional disinhibition and executive functioning in dementia. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[31]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[32]  M. Roesch,et al.  A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[34]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.