Comprehensible Visualization for Augmented Reality

This article presents interactive visualizations to support the comprehension of spatial relationships between virtual and real world objects for augmented reality (AR) applications. To enhance the clarity of such relationships we discuss visualization techniques and their suitability for AR. We apply them on different AR applications with different goals, e.g. in X-Ray vision or in applications which draw a user's attention to an object of interest. We demonstrate how Focus and Context (F+C) visualizations are used to affect the user's perception of hidden or nearby objects by presenting contextual information in the area of augmentation. We discuss the organization and the possible sources of data for visualizations in augmented reality and present cascaded and multi level F+C visualizations to address complex, cluttered scenes that are inevitable in real environments. This article also shows filters and tools to interactively control the amount of augmentation. It compares the impact of real world context preserving to a pure virtual and uniform enhancement of these structures for augmentations of real world imagery. Finally this paper discusses the stylization of sparse object representations for AR to improve x-ray vision.

[1]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Illustrative Context-Preserving Volume Rendering , 2005, EuroVis.

[2]  Takafumi Saito,et al.  Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Shade trees , 1984, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  An Interaction View on Information Visualization , 2003, Eurographics.

[5]  Timo Ropinski,et al.  Interactive Importance-Driven Visualization Techniques for Medical Volume Data , 2005 .

[6]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information , 2002, Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[7]  Jens Schneider,et al.  ClearView: An Interactive Context Preserving Hotspot Visualization Technique , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Interactive context-driven visualization tools for augmented reality , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[9]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Flexible parametrization of scene graphs , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[10]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Interactive Focus and Context Visualization for Augmented Reality , 2007, 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[11]  Ivan Viola,et al.  Importance-driven volume rendering , 2004, IEEE Visualization 2004.

[12]  John Viega,et al.  3D magic lenses , 1996, UIST '96.

[13]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Contextual Anatomic Mimesis Hybrid In-Situ Visualization Method for Improving Multi-Sensory Depth Perception in Medical Augmented Reality , 2007, 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[15]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Enhancing Depth-Perception with Flexible Volumetric Halos , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Augmented reality as a new media experience , 2001, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality.

[17]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Two-Level Volume Rendering , 2001, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[18]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Smooth Brushing for Focus+Context Visualization of Simulation Data in 3D , 2002, WSCG.

[19]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Information filtering for mobile augmented reality , 2000, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR 2000).

[20]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Cutaways and ghosting: satisfying visibility constraints in dynamic 3D illustrations , 1992, The Visual Computer.