The influence of fracturing process on microseismic propagation

In the hydraulic fracturing process, the velocity model for microseismic location is usually constructed by well logs, seismic data or calibration shots which ignore the influence of the fracturing process. In this work, we examine its influence by simulating microseismic events and pore pressure variation in the fracturing process. Besides the microseismicity produced by hydraulic fracture extension, we also simulate the microseismicity caused by fluid leakage by means of the critical pore pressure criterion. The Coates-Schoenberg method and fracture compliances are then applied to calculate the real-time velocity in the fracturing process, and 3D ray tracing method is applied to compare the microseismic propagation variation in the different stages of the fracturing process. The results of the simulation show that the deviation caused by the fracturing process varies considerably between different receiver locations, and the overall deviation increases with the fracturing process. Finally, a new method is constructed to evaluate the travel time deviation in real data.

[1]  Tomáš Fischer,et al.  Microseismic signatures of hydraulic fracture growth in sediment formations: Observations and modeling , 2008 .

[2]  I. Main,et al.  Dual simulations of fluid flow and seismic wave propagation in a fractured network: effects of pore pressure on seismic signature , 2006 .

[3]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Microseismicity Induced By Hydraulic Fracturing: Evaluation And Interpretation In Terms of the Kaiser Effect , 2007 .

[4]  Magnus Wangen,et al.  Finite element modeling of hydraulic fracturing on a reservoir scale in 2D , 2011 .

[5]  R. Horne,et al.  Investigation of injection-induced seismicity using a coupled fluid flow and rate/state friction model , 2011 .

[6]  K. Nihei,et al.  Fractured reservoirs: An analysis of coupled elastodynamic and permeability changes from pore-pressure variation , 2006 .

[7]  Michael Schoenberg,et al.  Finite-difference modeling of faults and fractures , 1995 .

[8]  H. D. Leslie,et al.  Automated Microseismic Event Detection and Location by Continuous Spatial Mapping , 2005 .

[9]  Feng Zhang,et al.  A new microseismic location method accounting for the influence of the hydraulic fracturing process , 2013 .

[10]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Acoustic emission induced by pore-pressure changes in sandstone samples , 2011 .

[11]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced microseismicity , 2002 .

[12]  Stefan Buske,et al.  Fast location of seismicity: A migration-type approach with application to hydraulic-fracturing data , 2007 .

[13]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Microseismic monitoring of borehole fluid injections: Data modeling and inversion for hydraulic properties of rocks , 2003 .

[14]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Seismic Emission Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing of Gas Reservoirs – Features of the Kaiser Effect , 2007 .

[15]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Fluid‐induced seismicity: Pressure diffusion and hydraulic fracturing , 2009 .

[16]  S. Shapiro Fluid-induced Seismicity: Pressure Diffusion and Hydraulic Fracturing , 2007 .

[17]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Microseismic estimates of hydraulic diffusivity in case of non‐linear fluid‐rock interaction , 2012 .

[18]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Petroleum reservoir characterization using downhole microseismic monitoring , 2010 .