Comparison of distinctive gait variables using two different biomechanical models for ankle joint kinematics

Gait analysis is an important instrument to investigate foot and ankle biomechanics in the field of footwear design. Results of this method should be objective and comparable. The purpose of this study was to compare two different approaches to quantify ankle joint kinematics: Functionally determined joint centres/axes (FA) versus a predictive model (PA). A single comprehensive marker set was defined. Twenty-two subjects were analysed, and distinctive gait variables were averaged across five trials. Agreement between methods was quantified according to Bland & Altman (Bland and Altman 1986. Lancet, i (8476), 307). Outcome variables differed remarkably between FA and PA at the talocrural (2–9°) and subtalar joints (1–6°). Considerable differences between variables describing motion of the ankle joint complex were primarily related to the use of different rotational axes and definitions of foot segments. This should be considered when studies using different foot models are compared.

[1]  T. Theologis,et al.  Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[2]  Markus Thomas Dettwyler Biomechanische Untersuchungen und Modellierungen am menschlichen oberen Sprunggelenk im Hinblick auf Arthroplastiken , 2005 .

[3]  Suzanne Halliday,et al.  Interobserver Variability of Gait Analysis in Patients With Cerebral Palsy , 2003, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[4]  Jirí Hrebícek,et al.  Solving Problems in Scientific Computing Using Maple and MATLAB® , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[5]  Gerald F Harris,et al.  Multisegmental foot modeling: a review. , 2008, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  D. De Clercq,et al.  A prospective study of gait related risk factors for exercise-related lower leg pain. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[8]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J Paysant,et al.  Increasing Shoe Instep Improves Gait Dynamics in Patients with a Tibiotalar Arthrodesis , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  H. Woltring 3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  S I Wolf,et al.  The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[13]  Peter Wolf,et al.  Erfassen der Vor- und Rückfussbewegungen im Gehen und Laufen , 2008 .

[14]  Alex Stacoff,et al.  Messsyteme, Messmethoden und Beispiele zur instrumentierten Ganganalyse; ; Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie : offizielles Organ der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Sportmedizin; , 2008 .

[15]  Wendy Gilleard,et al.  Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[16]  V. T. Inman,et al.  Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle , 1969 .

[17]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[18]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[19]  Masami Akai,et al.  Addition of an arch support improves the biomechanical effect of a laterally wedged insole. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[20]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[21]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Alex Stacoff,et al.  Die Anwendung der Ganganalyse in der Fusschirurgie , 2008 .

[23]  Alex Stacoff,et al.  Erfassen der Vor- und Rückfussbewegungen im Gehen und Laufen; ; Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie; , 2008 .

[24]  L. Chèze,et al.  Comparison of different calculations of three-dimensional joint kinematics from video-based system data. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Andrew H. Findlow,et al.  Redefining biomechanics of the foot and ankle , 2005 .

[26]  A. Hreljac Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. , 2005, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[27]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  A. Leardini,et al.  Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[29]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Part 1: Theoretical Background , 1987 .

[30]  W. Gander Least squares fit of point clouds , 1998 .

[31]  P Lundgren,et al.  Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[32]  James Stamey,et al.  Using Bland−Altman to Assess Agreement between Two Medical Devices – Don’t Forget the Confidence Intervals! , 2007, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[33]  S. Graua,et al.  What are causes and treatment strategies for patellar-tendinopathy in female runners ? , 2008 .

[34]  Christian Maiwald,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Runners with Achilles Mid-Portion Tendinopathy , 2009, Foot & ankle international.